Re: git: 9b4c606b96ce - main - bsdinstall/partedit: Fix UFS auto partitioning
- Reply: Enji Cooper : "Re: git: 9b4c606b96ce - main - bsdinstall/partedit: Fix UFS auto partitioning"
- Reply: Alfonso S. Siciliano: "Re: git: 9b4c606b96ce - main - bsdinstall/partedit: Fix UFS auto partitioning"
- In reply to: Alfonso S. Siciliano: "git: 9b4c606b96ce - main - bsdinstall/partedit: Fix UFS auto partitioning"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 00:20:11 UTC
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:24:56PM +0000, Alfonso S. Siciliano wrote:
> The branch main has been updated by asiciliano:
>
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9b4c606b96ce8a8b011dc50295c71c38741a0f4f
>
> commit 9b4c606b96ce8a8b011dc50295c71c38741a0f4f
> Author: Alfonso S. Siciliano <asiciliano@FreeBSD.org>
> AuthorDate: 2022-04-29 23:19:30 +0000
> Commit: Alfonso S. Siciliano <asiciliano@FreeBSD.org>
> CommitDate: 2022-04-29 23:24:23 +0000
>
> bsdinstall/partedit: Fix UFS auto partitioning
>
> Fix bsdinstall "Auto (UFS) Guided Disk Setup" and sade(8) "Auto".
> The problem is a string comparison failure, it arose during the
> dialog(3)/bsddialog(3) form conversion:
>
> * dialog uses only form.text while bsdialog differentiates between
> form.init and form.value.
> * dialog always allocates memory for form values while bsddialog only
> when a button is pressed.
>
> Reviewed by: bapt
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35033
> ---
> usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/gpart_ops.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/gpart_ops.c b/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/gpart_ops.c
> index 65cda247e146..26aedb58ef39 100644
> --- a/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/gpart_ops.c
> +++ b/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/gpart_ops.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,12 @@ addpartform:
> init_allocated = true;
> goto addpartform;
> }
> + } else { /* auto partitioning */
> + items[0].value = strdup(items[0].init);
> + items[1].value = strdup(items[1].init);
> + items[2].value = strdup(items[2].init);
> + if (nitems > 3)
> + items[3].value = strdup(items[3].init);
> }
>
> /*
>
Hey Alfonso,
Would it be a good idea to check the return value of strdup in this
particular case?
Thanks,
--
Shawn Webb
Cofounder / Security Engineer
HardenedBSD
https://git.hardenedbsd.org/hardenedbsd/pubkeys/-/raw/master/Shawn_Webb/03A4CBEBB82EA5A67D9F3853FF2E67A277F8E1FA.pub.asc