git: 654292c0d683 - stable/14 - libthr: add some tests for pthread_atfork() handling
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 04:55:24 UTC
The branch stable/14 has been updated by kevans:
URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=654292c0d683fb7805df7f876693e125250024bb
commit 654292c0d683fb7805df7f876693e125250024bb
Author: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-11-14 01:33:36 +0000
Commit: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2024-11-22 04:54:52 +0000
libthr: add some tests for pthread_atfork() handling
Test that it generally functions, and also that registering multiple
times calls each handler in the order that it's documented to call them
in.
Reviewed by: kib, markj
(cherry picked from commit 7e6ac503ffeb81733272d54af367db58e45e57ca)
---
lib/libthr/tests/Makefile | 1 +
lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 228 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile b/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile
index d882ccfd877c..34e48c63d197 100644
--- a/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile
+++ b/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ NETBSD_ATF_TESTS_SH+= cancel_test
NETBSD_ATF_TESTS_SH+= exit_test
NETBSD_ATF_TESTS_SH+= resolv_test
+ATF_TESTS_C+= atfork_test
ATF_TESTS_C+= umtx_op_test
ATF_TESTS_C+= pthread_sigqueue_test
diff --git a/lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c b/lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5133330b1247
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+/*-
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+#include <atf-c.h>
+
+#define EXIT_NOPREPARE 1
+#define EXIT_CALLEDPARENT 2
+#define EXIT_NOCHILD 3
+#define EXIT_BADORDER 4
+
+static int child;
+static int forked;
+static int parent;
+
+static void
+basic_prepare(void)
+{
+ ATF_REQUIRE(parent == 0);
+ forked++;
+}
+
+static void
+basic_parent(void)
+{
+ ATF_REQUIRE(forked != 0);
+ parent++;
+}
+
+static void
+basic_child(void)
+{
+ if (!forked)
+ _exit(EXIT_NOPREPARE);
+ if (parent != 0)
+ _exit(EXIT_CALLEDPARENT);
+ child++;
+}
+
+/*
+ * In the basic test, we'll register just once and set some globals to confirm
+ * that the prepare/parent callbacks were executed as expected. The child will
+ * use its exit status to communicate to us if the callback was not executed
+ * properly since we cannot assert there. This is a subset of the
+ * multi-callback test, but separated out so that it's more obvious from running
+ * the atfork_test if pthread_atfork() is completely broken or just
+ * out-of-order.
+ */
+ATF_TC(basic_atfork);
+ATF_TC_HEAD(basic_atfork, tc)
+{
+ atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr",
+ "Checks invocation of all three atfork callbacks");
+}
+ATF_TC_BODY(basic_atfork, tc)
+{
+ pid_t p, wpid;
+ int status;
+
+ pthread_atfork(basic_prepare, basic_parent, basic_child);
+
+ p = fork();
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE(p >= 0);
+ if (p == 0)
+ _exit(child != 0 ? 0 : EXIT_NOCHILD);
+
+ /*
+ * The child can't use any of our standard atf-c(3) macros, so we have
+ * to rely on the exit status to convey any shenanigans.
+ */
+ while ((wpid = waitpid(p, &status, 0)) != p) {
+ ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(EINTR, wpid == -1);
+ if (wpid == -1)
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(WIFEXITED(status),
+ "child did not exit cleanly, status %x", status);
+
+ status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
+ ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(status == 0, "atfork in child %s",
+ status == EXIT_NOPREPARE ? "did not see `prepare` execute" :
+ (status == EXIT_CALLEDPARENT ? "observed `parent` executing" :
+ (status == EXIT_NOCHILD ? "did not see `child` execute" :
+ "mystery")));
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE(forked != 0);
+ ATF_REQUIRE(parent != 0);
+ ATF_REQUIRE(child == 0);
+}
+
+static void
+multi_assert(bool cond, bool can_assert)
+{
+ if (can_assert)
+ ATF_REQUIRE((cond));
+ else if (!(cond))
+ _exit(EXIT_BADORDER);
+}
+
+static void
+multi_bump(int *var, int bit, bool can_assert)
+{
+ int mask, val;
+
+ mask = (1 << (bit - 1));
+ val = *var;
+
+ /*
+ * Every bit below this one must be set, and none of the upper bits
+ * should be set.
+ */
+ multi_assert((val & mask) == 0, can_assert);
+ if (bit == 1)
+ multi_assert(val == 0, can_assert);
+ else
+ multi_assert((val & ~mask) == (mask - 1), can_assert);
+
+ *var |= mask;
+}
+
+static void
+multi_prepare1(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * The bits are flipped for prepare because it's supposed to be called
+ * in the reverse order of registration.
+ */
+ multi_bump(&forked, 2, true);
+}
+static void
+multi_prepare2(void)
+{
+ multi_bump(&forked, 1, true);
+}
+
+static void
+multi_parent1(void)
+{
+ multi_bump(&parent, 1, true);
+}
+static void
+multi_parent2(void)
+{
+ multi_bump(&parent, 2, true);
+}
+
+static void
+multi_child1(void)
+{
+ multi_bump(&child, 1, false);
+}
+static void
+multi_child2(void)
+{
+ multi_bump(&child, 2, false);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The multi-atfork test works much like the basic one, but it registers
+ * multiple times and enforces an order. The child still does just as strict
+ * of tests as the parent and continues to communicate the results of those
+ * tests back via its exit status.
+ */
+ATF_TC(multi_atfork);
+ATF_TC_HEAD(multi_atfork, tc)
+{
+ atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr",
+ "Checks that multiple callbacks are called in the documented order");
+}
+ATF_TC_BODY(multi_atfork, tc)
+{
+ pid_t p, wpid;
+ int status;
+
+ pthread_atfork(multi_prepare1, multi_parent1, multi_child1);
+ pthread_atfork(multi_prepare2, multi_parent2, multi_child2);
+
+ p = fork();
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE(p >= 0);
+ if (p == 0)
+ _exit(child != 0 ? 0 : EXIT_NOCHILD);
+
+ /*
+ * The child can't use any of our standard atf-c(3) macros, so we have
+ * to rely on the exit status to convey any shenanigans.
+ */
+ while ((wpid = waitpid(p, &status, 0)) != p) {
+ ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(EINTR, wpid == -1);
+ if (wpid == -1)
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(WIFEXITED(status),
+ "child did not exit cleanly, status %x", status);
+
+ status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
+ ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(status == 0, "atfork in child %s",
+ status == EXIT_BADORDER ? "called in wrong order" :
+ (status == EXIT_NOCHILD ? "did not see `child` execute" :
+ "mystery"));
+
+ ATF_REQUIRE(forked != 0);
+ ATF_REQUIRE(parent != 0);
+ ATF_REQUIRE(child == 0);
+}
+
+ATF_TP_ADD_TCS(tp)
+{
+ ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, basic_atfork);
+ ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, multi_atfork);
+ return (atf_no_error());
+}