Re: git: 31ec8b6407fd - main - sys/netinet6: Implement RFC 7217
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 19:17:15 UTC
On 9/21/25 20:56, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > G> A C program would have included the system include and noticed the change, > G> but this software has hardcoded the struct in go code and requires > G> patching. > G> > G> I'm attaching a simple patch for the ports tree for this port, it compiles > G> but I've not tested it at runtime, could you try applying this patch to the > G> ports tree and recompile the port, and report back? > G> > G> Please note this is not a proper patch for the ports tree, it just fixes > G> the problem, but would break it for anyone else, I'll produce a proper > G> patch for the ports tree once I have confirmed the approach woks. > > Is struct nd_ifinfo something that is used as argument to ioctl(2)? > If so, then adding counter_u64_t into it is not correct. > > I would suggest to not revert the change as a whole, but remove the > counter only and bring struct nd_ifinfo back to original. The counter > should probably go into struct in6_ifextra that is pointed by > if->if_afdata[AF_INET6]. Thanks for the feedback and suggestion! You are definitely right! I'm in the process to create a review for such a change shortly, I'll post it as soon as I'm able to have the code tested. -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>