Re: git: 2612f1b8649b - main - deadfs: Return ENXIO instead of EIO when the device is gone.
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: git: 2612f1b8649b - main - deadfs: Return ENXIO instead of EIO when the device is gone."
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: git: 2612f1b8649b - main - deadfs: Return ENXIO instead of EIO when the device is gone."
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:36:19 UTC
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:12:30AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Konstantin Belousov writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 07:41:11AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > Something changed recently, and while testing this fix, I noticed > > Nothing changed WRT code, it is just a race that causes the behavior. > > That is why I wrote "something", because I agree that it is not code > in our tree which has changed. > > > > that drm-kmod-66/i915kms may be the condition which trigger > > > the different code-path. > > It worries me if loading drm-kmod-66/i915kms can cause this kind > of change of behaviour. > > Even with the fix, I see 2-4 read(2) operations return EIO before > the ENXIO manifests. > > The only hypothesis I have, is that something in DRM-world hogs > some kind of HW resource, but I do not have time (nor drm-skillz) > to look into that this morning, and I wanted to get the ENXIO fix > in for RELENG-15 purposes[1]. I do not think that DRM really affects the code path for io. I see several EIOs in CAM, in particular scsi_da.c, but I do not know CAM/USB/umass stack to track that down by reading.