From nobody Fri Aug 15 22:07:22 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-src-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c3bnh1LCZz64Mdh; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 22:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c3bnf70cbz3lFB; Fri, 15 Aug 2025 22:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2001:470:d5e7:1::1 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kostikbel@gmail.com) smtp.mailfrom=kostikbel@gmail.com Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by kib.kiev.ua (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 57FM7M9U036711; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:07:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 57FM7M9U036711 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 57FM7MoU036710; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:07:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:07:22 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org, srcmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 7ac276298b72 - main - Remove Secure RPC DES authentication Message-ID: References: <202508101537.57AFbHrI067216@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on tom.home X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.90 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.896]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org,dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4c3bnf70cbz3lFB On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Lexi Winter wrote: > Konstantin Belousov: > > The commit breaks libc ABI and must be reverted. > > This email is the formal request to do so. > > > To make it clear: despite the presence of symcompat versions, there is > > no justification to remove the implementation. Default version for > > symbols might be removed, but the implementation shall be left alone. > > okay, done. Thank you. > however, unless i removed more than i intended, none of > this code works since it relies on keyserv (which was removed months > ago), so it's basically dead code. It depends on what user might do with its system. Also, unless I mis-remember, the removal caused issues for linking xserver, am I right? > > > This is how we handle all other cases of obsoleted interfaces, gets() > > being the exemplary case. > > this is a little different from gets, since gets still worked even after > the public interface was removed. The definition of 'worked' might vary.