Re: git: 5e248c23d995 - main - tcp: retain some CC signals outside of kernel scope
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:38:06 UTC
On 2/24/24 12:02 PM, Richard Scheffenegger wrote: > The branch main has been updated by rscheff: > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=5e248c23d995a059d24f4784d5a256cddd42e557 > > commit 5e248c23d995a059d24f4784d5a256cddd42e557 > Author: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org> > AuthorDate: 2024-02-24 20:01:54 +0000 > Commit: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2024-02-24 20:01:54 +0000 > > tcp: retain some CC signals outside of kernel scope > > Summary: fix build error after f74352fbcf15341accaf5a92240871f98323215d > > Reviewers: #transport! > > Subscribers: imp, melifaro, glebius > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D44066 > --- > sys/netinet/cc/cc.h | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h b/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h > index 5b2cb58a24a0..aac0825e5fe1 100644 > --- a/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h > +++ b/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h > @@ -121,12 +121,15 @@ struct cc_var { > #define CCF_HYSTART_CAN_SH_CWND 0x0800 /* Can hystart when going CSS -> CA slam the cwnd */ > #define CCF_HYSTART_CONS_SSTH 0x1000 /* Should hystart use the more conservative ssthresh */ > > +#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) */ > typedef enum { > +#if defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) > /* ACK types passed to the ack_received() hook. */ > CC_ACK = 0x0001, /* Regular in sequence ACK. */ > CC_DUPACK = 0x0002, /* Duplicate ACK. */ > CC_PARTIALACK = 0x0004, /* Not yet. */ > CC_SACK = 0x0008, /* Not yet. */ > +#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) */ > /* Congestion signal types passed to the cong_signal() hook. */ > CC_ECN = 0x0100, /* ECN marked packet received. */ > CC_RTO = 0x0200, /* RTO fired. */ > @@ -138,7 +141,6 @@ typedef enum { > */ > CC_SIGPRIVMASK = 0xFF000000 /* Mask to check if sig is private. */ > } ccsignal_t; > -#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) */ Is there a good reason to not just expose all of the enum values always? -- John Baldwin