Re: git: 8271d9b99a3b - main - libsys: remove usage of pthread_once and _once_stub
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:17:52 UTC
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:51:04AM +0000, Jessica Clarke wrote: > On 21 Feb 2024, at 00:29, Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > The branch main has been updated by kib: > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=8271d9b99a3b98c662ee9a6257a144284b7e1728 > > > > commit 8271d9b99a3b98c662ee9a6257a144284b7e1728 > > Author: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> > > AuthorDate: 2024-02-20 14:45:29 +0000 > > Commit: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> > > CommitDate: 2024-02-21 00:26:11 +0000 > > > > libsys: remove usage of pthread_once and _once_stub > > > > that existed in auxv.c, use simple bool gate instead. This leaves a > > small window if two threads try to call _elf_aux_info(3) simultaneously. > > The situation is safe because auxv parsing is really idempotent. The > > parsed data is the same, and we store atomic types (int/long/ptr) so > > double-init does not matter. > > You still need to load acquire and store release aux_once though, > otherwise you can see aux_once as true yet read the pre-initialised > data. In practice that’s surely very hard to hit, but the code as > written is now wrong. Also, idempotence should probably be made > unnecessary by using 0/1/2 state for uninitialised/initialising/ > initialised, as it’s still technically UB from a C AM perspective due > to not being data race free if two threads initialise at the same time. > Better to just do the correct thing rather than risk things going wrong. There is too much to handle 'in process' state for loosing thread, I need the whole libthr machinery. I added the fences, thanks for noting. WRT being UB from pure C, we already have much more assumptions about atomicity.