Re: git: a8b70cf26030 - main - netpfil: Use accessor functions and named constants for all tcphdr flags
- Reply: Antoine Brodin : "Re: git: a8b70cf26030 - main - netpfil: Use accessor functions and named constants for all tcphdr flags"
- In reply to: Dimitry Andric : "Re: git: a8b70cf26030 - main - netpfil: Use accessor functions and named constants for all tcphdr flags"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:32:48 UTC
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023, 4:39 AM Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 29 Dec 2023, at 11:17, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > On 29 Dec 2023, at 08:35, Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 10:37 PM Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Antoine, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 08:48:36PM +0000, Antoine Brodin wrote: > >>> A> > netpfil: Use accessor functions and named constants for all > tcphdr flags > >>> A> > > >>> ... > >>> A> This breaks some ports: > >>> A> /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:82:8: error: unknown type name 'inline' > >>> > >>> Definitely some ports that use some strange compilers :) > >>> > >>> Can you please give at least port names? > >> > >> Some examples: > >> > >> > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/gohan04/data/mainamd64PR275986-default-foo/2023-12-28_20h35m41s/logs/errors/nspr-4.35.log > >> > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/gohan04/data/mainamd64PR275986-default-foo/2023-12-28_20h35m41s/logs/errors/opusfile-0.12_1.log > > > > The culprit is likely the "-ansi" option. Just get rid of that, it is > not really useful: > > > > cc -o prmapopt.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -pipe > -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -Wall -fPIC -UDEBUG > -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" > -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" > -DNDEBUG=1 -DHAVE_VISIBILITY_HIDDEN_ATTRIBUTE=1 -DHAVE_VISIBILITY_PRAGMA=1 > -DXP_UNIX=1 -DFREEBSD=1 -DHAVE_BSD_FLOCK=1 -DHAVE_SOCKLEN_T=1 > -DHAVE_POINTER_LOCALTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_DLADDR=1 -DHAVE_LCHOWN=1 > -DHAVE_SETPRIORITY=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_SYSCALL=1 > -DHAVE_SECURE_GETENV=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DFORCE_PR_LOG > -D_PR_PTHREADS -UHAVE_CVAR_BUILT_ON_SEM -D_NSPR_BUILD_ > -I../../../dist/include/nspr -I../../../pr/include > -I../../../pr/include/private prmapopt.c > > In file included from prmapopt.c:46: > > In file included from prmapopt.c:46: > > /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:82:8: error: unknown type name 'inline' > > 82 | static inline uint16_t > > | ^ > > Hm, I may have spoken too soon here. If this port has always compiled > successfully with -ansi, then indeed it may not be that handy to directly > use the 'inline' keyword in system headers. I think most other system > headers use '__inline', which is supported by both gcc and clang, even in > ANSI mode. And if the compiler somehow does not support __inline, > sys/cdefs.h can make sure all those keywords get removed. > Yes. You have to use __inline in system headers. Warner -Dimitry > >