Re: git: fb17dfa0c83c - main - libicp: unbreak for armv6 after recent OpenZFS import
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:14:47 UTC
On 12 Dec 2023, at 17:01, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 12/8/23 3:10 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> The branch main has been updated by dim: >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=fb17dfa0c83cc213400fe7e1ed7a39253a4fcefa >> commit fb17dfa0c83cc213400fe7e1ed7a39253a4fcefa >> Author: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> >> AuthorDate: 2023-12-08 23:09:36 +0000 >> Commit: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> >> CommitDate: 2023-12-08 23:09:50 +0000 >> libicp: unbreak for armv6 after recent OpenZFS import >> The following upstream commit: >> 727497ccdfcc module/icp/asm-arm/sha2: enable non-SIMD asm kernels on armv5/6 >> does indeed enable sha2 asm for earlier arm CPUs, but since libicp's >> Makefile was not updated, this leads to: >> ld: error: undefined reference due to --no-allow-shlib-undefined: zfs_sha256_block_armv7 >> Fix it by compiling sha256-armv7.S and sha512-armv7.S for armv6 too. >> Fixes: 3494f7c019fc >> --- >> cddl/lib/libicp/Makefile | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> diff --git a/cddl/lib/libicp/Makefile b/cddl/lib/libicp/Makefile >> index 2d9bb3c67cb4..085818f2371a 100644 >> --- a/cddl/lib/libicp/Makefile >> +++ b/cddl/lib/libicp/Makefile >> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ ASM_SOURCES_AS = \ >> asm-x86_64/blake3/blake3_sse41.S >> CFLAGS+= -D__amd64 -D_SYS_STACK_H -UHAVE_AES >> -.elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "armv7" >> +.elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "armv6" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "armv7" > > Since this applies to all 32-bit arm flavors, should this be using > ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "arm" instead? You may be right; if I read https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/727497ccdfcc correctly: > module/icp/asm-arm/sha2: enable non-SIMD asm kernels on armv5/6 > My merged pull request #15557 fixes compilation of sha2 kernels on arm > v5/6. However, the compiler guards only allows sha256/512_armv7_impl to > be used when __ARM_ARCH > 6. This patch enables these ASM kernels on all > arm architectures. Some compiler guards are adjusted accordingly to > avoid the unnecessary compilation of SIMD (e.g., neon, armv8ce) kernels > on old architectures. > > Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> > Signed-off-by: Shengqi Chen <harry-chen@outlook.com> > Closes #15623 It's talking about "all arm architectures", but I'm not sure if this means all arm architectures supported by OpenZFS, or in general. I would assume the latter. -Dimitry