Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword.

On 10/7/22 7:43 AM, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote:
> On 2022-10-07 16:21:01, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> 
>> Would uint32_t be more clear?
> 
> I don't disagree with the style change to the point that I demand it be
> corrected, please keep it the way it is now to avoid more churn.

Agreed.

> I just opposed the more general idea that this is an improvement.  I say
> it's debatable, at least until we have style.9 rule one way or the other.

Yeah, I think it's a regression to be honest.  None of the other unsigned base
C types (unsigned short, unsigned long, etc.) have these short cuts in the
language.  I consider it bit of an odd anachronism.  If you really want to use
a shorter spelling of "unsigned int" in the tree, I think "u_int" is a better
choice and more typical in FreeBSD.

-- 
John Baldwin