git: b042d10cdc71 - main - ofwfb: fix vga/hdmi console with ASMEDIA during boot on powerpc64(le)

From: Alfredo Dal'Ava Junior <alfredo_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:48:42 UTC
The branch main has been updated by alfredo:

URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=b042d10cdc71ddd6ef3449261d712b05c648746e

commit b042d10cdc71ddd6ef3449261d712b05c648746e
Author:     Alfredo Dal'Ava Junior <alfredo@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2021-11-03 16:42:28 +0000
Commit:     Alfredo Dal'Ava Junior <alfredo@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2021-11-03 16:42:28 +0000

    ofwfb: fix vga/hdmi console with ASMEDIA during boot on powerpc64(le)
    
    On recent OpenBMC firmware, the onboard ASMEDIA video card framebuffer
    address was removed from device tree for security purposes (value is set
    to zero to avoid leaking the address).
    
    This patch works around the problem by taking framebuffer base address
    from the "ranges" property of a parent node.
    
    Reviewed by:    luporl, jhibbits (on IRC)
    MFC after:      2 weeks
    Sponsored by:   Instituto de Pesquisas Eldorado (eldorado.org.br)
    Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30626
---
 sys/dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c b/sys/dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c
index 9dc674c0ebf9..e388356450d6 100644
--- a/sys/dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c
+++ b/sys/dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ struct ofwfb_softc {
 	uint32_t	vendor_id;
 };
 
-#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA	0x10de
+#define PCI_VID_NVIDIA	0x10de	/* NVIDIA Corporation */
+#define PCI_VID_ASPEED	0x1a03	/* ASPEED Technology, Inc. */
 
 static void ofwfb_initialize(struct vt_device *vd);
 static vd_probe_t	ofwfb_probe;
@@ -297,6 +298,104 @@ ofwfb_bitblt_text(struct vt_device *vd, const struct vt_window *vw,
 #endif
 }
 
+
+/*
+ * Decode OpenFirmware/IEEE 1275-1994 "ranges" property
+ *
+ * XXX: this is similar to ofw_pcib_fill_ranges but cannot use it here because
+ *      it's not possible to allocate memory at the moment this is funcion is
+ *      used. Since there are other similar functions dealing with "ranges"
+ *      property, a proper refactoring is suggested.
+ */
+static uint64_t
+decode_pci_ranges_host_addr(phandle_t pcinode)
+{
+	struct simplebus_range {
+		uint64_t bus;
+		uint64_t host;
+		uint64_t size;
+	};
+
+	struct simplebus_range ranges[4];
+	int nranges, host_address_cells;
+	pcell_t acells, scells;
+	cell_t base_ranges[64];
+
+	ssize_t nbase_ranges;
+	int i, j, k;
+
+	if (!OF_hasprop(pcinode, "ranges"))
+		return (0);
+
+	if (OF_getencprop(pcinode, "#address-cells", &acells, sizeof(acells)) !=
+	    sizeof(acells))
+		return (0);
+
+	if (OF_getencprop(pcinode, "#size-cells", &scells, sizeof(scells)) !=
+		sizeof(scells))
+		return (0);
+
+	if (OF_searchencprop(OF_parent(pcinode), "#address-cells",
+		&host_address_cells, sizeof(host_address_cells)) !=
+		sizeof(host_address_cells))
+		return (0);
+
+	nbase_ranges = OF_getproplen(pcinode, "ranges");
+	nranges = nbase_ranges / sizeof(cell_t) / (acells + host_address_cells + scells);
+
+	/* prevent buffer overflow during iteration */
+	if (nranges > sizeof(ranges) / sizeof(ranges[0]))
+		nranges = sizeof(ranges) / sizeof(ranges[0]);
+
+	/* decode range value and return the first valid address */
+	OF_getencprop(pcinode, "ranges", base_ranges, nbase_ranges);
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < nranges; i++) {
+		ranges[i].bus = 0;
+		for (k = 0; k < acells; k++) {
+			ranges[i].bus <<= 32;
+			ranges[i].bus |= base_ranges[j++];
+		}
+
+		ranges[i].host = 0;
+		for (k = 0; k < host_address_cells; k++) {
+			ranges[i].host <<= 32;
+			ranges[i].host |= base_ranges[j++];
+		}
+		ranges[i].size = 0;
+		for (k = 0; k < scells; k++) {
+			ranges[i].size <<= 32;
+			ranges[i].size |= base_ranges[j++];
+		}
+
+		if (ranges[i].host != 0)
+			return (ranges[i].host);
+	}
+
+	return (0);
+}
+
+static bus_addr_t
+find_pci_host_address(phandle_t node)
+{
+	uint64_t addr;
+
+	/*
+	 * According to IEEE STD 1275, if property "ranges" exists but has a
+	 * zero-length property value, the child address space is identical
+	 * to the parent address space.
+	 */
+	while (node) {
+		if (OF_hasprop(node, "ranges")) {
+			addr = decode_pci_ranges_host_addr(node);
+			if (addr != 0)
+				return ((bus_addr_t)addr);
+		}
+		node = OF_parent(node);
+	}
+
+	return (0);
+}
+
 static void
 ofwfb_initialize(struct vt_device *vd)
 {
@@ -350,7 +449,7 @@ ofwfb_initialize(struct vt_device *vd)
 		 * There is no good way to determine the correct option, as this
 		 * is independent of endian swapping.
 		 */
-		if (sc->vendor_id == PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA)
+		if (sc->vendor_id == PCI_VID_NVIDIA)
 			sc->argb = 0;
 		else
 			sc->argb = 1;
@@ -430,7 +529,6 @@ ofwfb_init(struct vt_device *vd)
 	    sizeof(vendor_id)) == sizeof(vendor_id))
 		sc->vendor_id = vendor_id;
 
-
 	/* Keep track of the OF node */
 	sc->sc_node = node;
 
@@ -497,12 +595,18 @@ ofwfb_init(struct vt_device *vd)
 	 * Grab the physical address of the framebuffer, and then map it
 	 * into our memory space. If the MMU is not yet up, it will be
 	 * remapped for us when relocation turns on.
+	 *
+	 * The ASPEED driver on recent petitboot versions doesn't expose the
+	 * physical address of framebuffer anymore for security. So it should
+	 * retrieve the address from PCI device properties.
 	 */
 	user_phys = 0;
 	TUNABLE_UINT64_FETCH("hw.ofwfb.physaddr", &user_phys);
-	fb_phys = (bus_addr_t)user_phys;
-	if (fb_phys)
-		sc->fb.fb_pbase = (vm_paddr_t)fb_phys;
+
+	if (user_phys)
+		sc->fb.fb_pbase = (vm_paddr_t)user_phys;
+	else if (sc->vendor_id == PCI_VID_ASPEED)
+		sc->fb.fb_pbase = find_pci_host_address(node);
 	else if (OF_hasprop(node, "address")) {
 
 		switch (OF_getproplen(node, "address")) {