Re: git: b7972779e599 - main - science/psi4: add comment

On 10/7/26 14:00, Yuri wrote:
> On 10/7/26 08:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> This is the wrong place to such comment why in the PORTNAME line ???
> 
> 
> Because people will be asking me to fix it and this isn't a port problem.

I'm confused:

<https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy24/data/main-amd64-default/p0b23c55e5d2c_s1e595e959f/logs/votca-2026_6.log>

is a recent successful build with no examples of the text:: =>> Error:

Also, that log file has no examples of the text: /basis/
(part of the paths the old report referenced).

Also, fallout's:

<https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=science%2Fpsi4&maintainer=&env=&category=&flavor=&older=0>

reports the most recent build failure was about a month ago:

science/psi4	1.11	yuri@FreeBSD.org	144amd64-default	build	2026-09-08 14:11	

(main-amd64-default and 150amd64-default also had failures that day.)

Is it some sort of test build for which the log file(s) are not public
that reports the problem? Can modern log(s) showing the failure be
provided? Can the command(s) that resulted in those log(s) be provided
as information for reproduction of the problem?

Overall: it is not clear to me just what is broken vs. what is not at
this point. It seems more context is needed.

> 
>> Another issue is: you are claiming this is an issue in poudriere, but
>> upstream has asked you questions about back in 2021 and they seems to
>> think this is not a poudriere bug.
> 
> 
> The comment says that some other ls commands should be run, and that
> this isn't likely a Poudriere problem. But they didn't say whose problem
> is this.
> This is certainly not this port's problem.
> 
>> Can you please get back to upstream before adding this comment?
> 
> 
> They didn't ask any question there.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yuri
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com