Re: git: 513318c5d748 - main - ports-mgmt/pkg: update to 2.6.0
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 19:40:53 UTC
On 3/2/26 13:01, Mark Millard wrote: > On 3/2/26 11:30, Vladimir Druzenko wrote: >> Hello! >> >> 02.03.2026 20:20, Baptiste Daroussin пишет: >>> The branch main has been updated by bapt: >>> >>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/? >>> id=513318c5d7487c5d47a91651bfbe8e08edc3ff42 >>> >>> commit 513318c5d7487c5d47a91651bfbe8e08edc3ff42 >>> Author: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> >>> AuthorDate: 2026-03-02 17:18:16 +0000 >>> Commit: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> >>> CommitDate: 2026-03-02 17:20:16 +0000 >>> >>> ports-mgmt/pkg: update to 2.6.0 >>> . . . >> >> After this update portmaster is totally broken. > > I'm having trouble following the logic here for how portmaster behavior > is a pkg bug. portmaster does not even list the pkg port as something it > depends on. See: > > <https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/ports-mgmt/portmaster/Makefile> > > May be it is implicit via some ports infrastructure that is used that in > turn uses pkg? > > . . . As noted yesterday's activity, it turned out that my memory of "pkg delete -f" intended behavior was just wrong. (Sorry for that noise.) But the sequence reported and the "pkg delete -f" bug also shows that portmaster can use pkg (indirectly via port infrastucture?) but does not declare a run-time dependency on sysutils/pkg . Should portmaster's Makefile declare a run-time dependency on sysutils/pkg ? -- === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com