From nobody Mon May 26 06:48:53 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b5RFD4RtQz5xMkv; Mon, 26 May 2025 06:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4b5RFC4l8gz3v2h; Mon, 26 May 2025 06:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=pfeifer.com header.s=pair-202402271039 header.b=hmAaX41P; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gerald@pfeifer.com designates 209.68.5.143 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gerald@pfeifer.com; dmarc=none Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4071533F24; Mon, 26 May 2025 02:48:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.20.13.127] (unknown [37.76.255.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18E6133F18; Mon, 26 May 2025 02:48:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 09:48:53 +0300 (+03) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Jason W. Bacon" cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 40478d7acd2a - main - biology/bifrost: Unbreak build on 15-CURRENT In-Reply-To: <202505151138.54FBcqe4040748@gitrepo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20a662ed-1233-c096-8615-c4df9e277713@pfeifer.com> References: <202505151138.54FBcqe4040748@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pfeifer.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type; s=pair-202402271039; bh=Vw4TMMmNtgCSrb12DnfJYugA1DadV7wiZe5HpVwE6kw=; b=hmAaX41PKZzgIdXvr48a/0/JJgPEn4LsiqZXglaDY9NpcKgdrzw5makWKiHLhZSK7Cy6Q/nGzEODdNrhYDlSbagVIJ9M4RtWDM+ngMNJSUsTxo4ZkUDexG1JP6w5CbYkxh/M4+4zRaGwE+o0VqBRN8ze/RidbVgbrgHAwd9RIyuB1438Ob3snExH25+vZz/Egb0NTDFnnPoiHMXjLVTuDwP3vsJrj3FczV0xHRDS4fPSLe1T8qiGCtPXPsl9qJWcKiBGkZbpKrMJ9QKaBBhsogVuxhxSeng+JLgulwgBYOq62TmRcaF7km1PPx9yx/J5xbRUY7Yav88EZj4k8KkyEw== X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 209.68.5.143 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4b5RFC4l8gz3v2h X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.901]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.46)[0.464]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:hamza.pair.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[pfeifer.com:s=pair-202402271039]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.05)[-0.048]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[gerald]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7859, ipnet:209.68.0.0/18, country:US]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pfeifer.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org,dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[pfeifer.com:+] On Thu, 15 May 2025, Jason W. Bacon wrote: > biology/bifrost: Unbreak build on 15-CURRENT > > Unable to identify the cause, use GCC as a workaround for now > No change on other FreeBSD versions : > +# Build fails with clang19, but succeeds with gcc13 > +# Have not figured out where this sz_link member is even supposed to come from > +# DataStorage.tcc:81:69: error: no member named 'sz_link' in 'DataStorage' > +.if ${OSVERSION} > 1500000 > +USE_GCC= yes > +.endif Did the build work with older versions of clang? If so, can you please use that instead of USE_GCC=yes? The latter really is quite painful for those looking after the lang/gcc* ports where increasingly they (we) have to deal with a heap of broken ports when updating the default version of GCC. Gerald