From nobody Sun Jun 22 19:41:28 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bQM6K2tChz609hr; Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xn--zhlsdorff-q9a.eu (mail.xn--zhlsdorff-q9a.eu [IPv6:2a01:4f8:261:3bc6::151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bQM6K01xxz45tl; Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from [192.168.67.7] (ip-109-42-240-2.web.vodafone.de [109.42.240.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd@toco-domains.de) by mail.xn--zhlsdorff-q9a.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42617416EC; Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 21:41:28 +0200 List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: git: a18dfb61a2c9 - main - textproc/libxml2: Update to 2.14.4 To: Daniel Engberg , Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org References: <202506211410.55LEAYad094492@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <4diqe7p4p6mmqa4hnjxcrq3u5jz7pjw5cjay4krfr4xeatp4jz@efcbcob76nq3> Content-Language: en-US From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=multimap; Matched map: WHITELIST_SENDER_DOMAIN X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.10 X-Rspamd-Server: mail.xn--zhlsdorff-q9a.eu X-Spam-Score: -0.10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4bQM6K01xxz45tl X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE] On 22.06.25 11:49, Daniel Engberg wrote: > On 2025-06-22 11:12, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 02:10:34PM +0000, Daniel Engberg wrote: >>> The branch main has been updated by diizzy: >>> >>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/? >>> id=a18dfb61a2c96a01f9536d70ad0f69390981833d >>> >>> commit a18dfb61a2c96a01f9536d70ad0f69390981833d >>> Author:     Daniel Engberg >>> AuthorDate: 2025-06-21 12:38:19 +0000 >>> Commit:     Daniel Engberg >>> CommitDate: 2025-06-21 14:09:31 +0000 >>> >>>      textproc/libxml2: Update to 2.14.4 >>>      PR:             279705, 287391 >>>      Approved by:    ports-sec (tz) via PR 287391 >> >> Daniel, this is a formal warning from portmgr. >> >> Stop pushing unapproved patches. >> >> The approval you had from ports secteam was for the security update, >> which was 287391, not for 279705. >> > > Hi, > > No? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287391#c20 > I specifically asked about 2.14.4 and mentioned 279705 > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287391#c21 > Update is mentioned once again > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287391#c22 (again, > 2.14.4) > > For which I got an approval > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287391#c23 Indeed. He got my (conditional) approval, like you can read in the linked comments. Since Daniel did not push any unapproved ports, I don’t see any basis for a formal warning here. Also, just as a side note: the ticket system really lacks the ability to capture some of the more important context – like which groups need to approve a commit, or which members have experience and authority in certain areas. That kind of information is just not easily available. Best, Torsten