Re: git: a3a0b0e15375 - main - net-mgmt/{victoria-metrics,vmutils}: update to version 1.132.0
- Reply: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: git: a3a0b0e15375 - main - net-mgmt/{victoria-metrics,vmutils}: update to version 1.132.0"
- In reply to: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: git: a3a0b0e15375 - main - net-mgmt/{victoria-metrics,vmutils}: update to version 1.132.0"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 14:41:24 UTC
On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 02:27:29PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:59:38AM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2025 at 10:30:14AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > commit a3a0b0e15375ebf059840f06c4181bc9c1742a5b
> > >
> > > net-mgmt/{victoria-metrics,vmutils}: update to version 1.132.0
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > > PR: 284564
> > > Submitted by: Jan van der Lugt
> > > Reported by: Michael Gruner
> >
> > Can you attribute these people appropriately by setting the commit author
> > instead of using the long-deprecated "Submitted by" tag?
>
> It is correctly attributed: the patch it mine and incorporates two *suggestions*
> made by those people, it's not if I applied submitted patch verbatim. The tag
Then just say so.
> cannot be deprecated as it serves its purpose just fine. On that tangent, if
The tag has been depreciated ever since git was introduced to the ports tree.
> "improper" commit logs bother you, perhaps you should start with your own ones,
> e.g. for commit 655a76dc986d?
>
Uhm, that is just a commit from Tools/scripts/rmport, with some half-baked fixups?
René