Re: git: 94e61d8da52e - main - www/caddy: Update to 2.10.1
- In reply to: Ashish SHUKLA: "Re: git: 94e61d8da52e - main - www/caddy: Update to 2.10.1"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 19:52:21 UTC
> On Aug 22, 2025, at 15:09, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish@freebsd.org> wrote: > > El 2025-08-22 12:00, Adam Weinberger escribió: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >>> On 2025-08-22 at 18:51, ashish@freebsd.org wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for staying on top of Go, and Caddy. >>> >>> I believe this version will require Go 1.25[0]. Maybe you're defaulting >> to Go 1.25 in your build environment ? >>> >>> >> =================================================================================== >> >>> ===> Fetching github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 dependencies >>> go: downloading go1.25.0 (freebsd/amd64) >>> # get https://proxy.golang.org/cel.dev/expr/@v/v0.24.0.mod >>> # get >> https://proxy.golang.org/cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata/@v/v0.7.0.mod >>> >> =================================================================================== >> >>> >>> References: >>> [0] https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/v2.10.1/go.mod#L3 >>> >>> HTH >>> -- >>> Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 >>> >>> "If I destroy you, what business is it of yours ?" (Dark Forest, Liu >> Cixin) >> >> It does, but that's as expected. Go doesn't do "versions" like we're used >> to anymore. If there's a version specified in go.mod, that version's stdlib >> will be used no matter what. If it's a future version (i.e. a 1.25 port >> like caddy on a 1.24 install), it will automatically download the 1.25 >> stdlib (as you noted above) and link against it. If it's an older version, >> it will adjust its stdlib to have only the features and quirks of that >> prior version. >> >> In other words, go x can build apps that specify go y, regardless of x <=> >> y. For this reason, there's no need for multiple lang/go ports, and in the >> future (i.e. when I have time to get to it) we'll remove all versioned >> ports and just have a single lang/go port, because it's capable of building >> stuff targetting any future or prior go version. >> >> TL;DR-- Yes, it requires go 1.25, but older (and newer!) versions will >> still build the same binary using the same stdlib. >> > > I see, so it's only dependency on stdlib, and not the toolchain. > > Sorry for the noise, and thanks for clarification. > > -- > Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 > > "If I destroy you, what business is it of yours ?" (Dark Forest, Liu Cixin) > > <signature.asc> Great description. I’ve been trying for months now to find the right phrasing to sell the idea. I think it’s going to massively improve the end-user experience, but it’s such a departure from how every other language port is expected to behave. Being able to accurately describe the approach is clearly the first and most important step. There’s a big POLA risk inherent to this and I don’t want to just do it until a critical mass is on board; hence, the need for a sales pitch. — Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org