From nobody Mon Aug 18 08:21:03 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c55Jb65Myz64qBD; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c55Jb5XP0z3VrD; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1755505263; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BYNa8QdgVuoUXStu9u/Dr7droxnROccTBWgx1/H8EFc=; b=CmLatirObY1ybPdht3LzT4X8JU/TxGLNljmmW1t73M8KXyALHSjBiM9l1ZqUU0+TCBkzp5 NWb9PyDLlkjsjJWNz/8+zRhUSdDCddmox2yK8mcXUcr+3knIRHU9tdFwSEvy5OksDgqAGd FmRxH5slalQIPkDO0yMnPj/WAMMrtZFBKqZaqgjULbFvzZTqOl6jc722EBHxI8jvxbdZle /R+Mvw34XUIGF5kygotvUPyru5qDHmcsLCEH9bUpfyzklh1lMsp61otN8vcKbWiRgz6Zow tpjIqrewH9eVqeup8YR8CbpCvg73VUG+xePDnkBWxgC3opJzNDnyVawp3hHDeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1755505263; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BYNa8QdgVuoUXStu9u/Dr7droxnROccTBWgx1/H8EFc=; b=tLaO5sdbqlhUp4nO0aimv8eFYK7iVE01A9je7Qdp/0/eR+6rDGUqnWXbRi5nF3o4ADaduH U6E+JQsx1Ttzlvo0UA0xe71sOHzfr2Jc41UAhMCuUGk6Md9IK1W/8MkW7pcvABryzKam3K K5w9JTZu72GK/Vrr0jeYb+IzAwNFSMQNslzzIPAuWl4qad9o1YMSS+xU4CXVaD+JL+NH+L vZ4by9jYQWCGKfqIc9th3dKZgd9DGsU60nxbtzHpzDGdd0tMgYe04msyg/uALIKrYKE4uJ xWZ+3hzg44A/Q/+IjwoT1ymifsZZ4nt6VzXpXgemIwnLYdE4rpmB2kLHwFBtLw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1755505263; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MI0SqB2HXjibKqk/t8qHgCnpSHf1bU2XsBtRR0N0Le0FzNejhWim4NB2YX+hiTQveKgfHw VuNR/t1HPqZ22ow4Q0kjH5AzVqf1IyjXhQVsjyN0OrrTh1/M/j+8l7CDD6KjfMumwl631D UE05L3fRzQzCSyM9bXla5SX24E8onZsuODRSgSdpovecYGOjMNzyiZ09NnB1NgqSWopD8g RZZb+KOlwc73atvS99syqHw4CBM/WZ7F8cH00BRf152+W6x35MkPyrj2B85NBftJ1ImNp1 IafmCRY48BHU6dcYKMN5mFOEbZAsQP8OimSm/IXtmXPE241dHyAqDnbviq6otQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A567C18D4D; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:21:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthias Andree Cc: Ronald Klop , portmgr , dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 192c4d399bd4 - main - security/p5-Authen-SASL: Use upstream version scheme Message-ID: References: <209650325.7925.1755343543296@localhost> <1d425dc8-4baa-448e-b8a5-33013db9fba4@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 10:05:55AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 18.08.25 um 09:25 schrieb Alexey Dokuchaev: > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 01:35:30PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > > > ... > > > Yep, current wording of the porter's handbook suggests that you're right. > > > > I find this PHB part misleading and even harmful. Traditional approach > > (start with PORTVERSION and only fallback to DISTVERSION for ill-formed > > versions) is IMHO more robust and error-resistant, not to mention more > > logical (PORT{NAME,VERSION,REVISION} triad). > > Care to explain why that would be "harmful"? https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main/2025-June/153181.html > > > So unless we version the porter's handbook and point out important > > > changes, how am I or are we to learn the preference after some 20 years? > > > > Keep using PORTVERSION like your muscle memory and common sense suggest or > > DISTVERSION if one prefers it as most of the times they're interchangeable. > > I'll make my own decisions, thanks. Right, that's exactly what I implied, given there are only two options and you or anyone else are free to use any of them. :-) ./danfe