Re: git: 2aa09e577ed8 - main - www/forgejo: Switch to using "FORGEJO_" prefixed environment variables

From: Vladimir Druzenko <vvd_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:30:55 UTC
21.11.2024 22:28, Cy Schubert пишет:
> In message <202411211621.4ALGLphJ029643@gitrepo.freebsd.org>, Vladimir
> Druzenko
>   writes:
>> The branch main has been updated by vvd:
>>
>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=2aa09e577ed8f1a0c1e79abd183677
>> 9cb8ca9411
>>
>> commit 2aa09e577ed8f1a0c1e79abd1836779cb8ca9411
>> Author:     Rudolph <rudolphfroger@dreamsolution.nl>
>> AuthorDate: 2024-11-21 15:49:59 +0000
>> Commit:     Vladimir Druzenko <vvd@FreeBSD.org>
>> CommitDate: 2024-11-21 16:17:04 +0000
>>
>>      www/forgejo: Switch to using "FORGEJO_" prefixed environment variables
>>      
>>      Switch the environment variables specified in the Forgejo RC file from
>>      "GITEA_" to "FORGEJO_".
>>      The old variables are still work, but new are preffered:
>>      https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/7015bdfa480e717299377b454
>> 7320ae6d70e9da2/modules/setting/path.go#L123
>>      Also, the Forgejo documentation uses new names:
>>      https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/admin/config-cheat-sheet/
>>      
>>      PR:             282771
>>      Approved by:    Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> (maintainer)
>> ---
>>   www/forgejo/files/forgejo.in | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/www/forgejo/files/forgejo.in b/www/forgejo/files/forgejo.in
>> index c635f3a9a9b1..2879239c7d68 100644
>> --- a/www/forgejo/files/forgejo.in
>> +++ b/www/forgejo/files/forgejo.in
>> @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ forgejo_start() {
>>   	/usr/sbin/daemon %%DAEMONARGS%% \
>>   		-u ${forgejo_user} -p ${pidfile} \
>>   		/usr/bin/env -i \
>> -		"GITEA_WORK_DIR=${forgejo_shared}" \
>> -		"GITEA_CUSTOM=${forgejo_custom}" \
>> +		"FORGEJO_WORK_DIR=${forgejo_shared}" \
>> +		"FORGEJO_CUSTOM=${forgejo_custom}" \
>>   		"HOME=${githome}" \
>>   		"PATH=%%PREFIX%%/bin:${PATH}" \
>>   		"USER=${forgejo_user}" \
>>
> This needs a PORTREVISION bump.

Don't think so. This commit didn't change runtime.

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir Druzenko