Re: git: 81a047b386e5 - main - www/*chromium: drop pulseaudio build dependency by using an internal copy

From: Vladimir Druzenko <vvd_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:25:39 UTC
25.06.2024 15:19, Robert Nagy пишет:
> On 25/06/24 14:24 GMT, Vladimir Druzenko wrote:
>> 30.05.2024 19:25, Sergey A. Osokin пишет:
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 03:15:53PM +0300, Vladimir Druzenko wrote:
>>>> 28.05.2024 09:26, Gleb Popov пишет:
>>>>> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 6:56 PM Vladimir Druzenko<vvd@freebsd.org>  wrote:
>>>>>> Just return all options.
>>>>> It is unrealistic to ask for removing Pulseaudio from default options
>>>>> as it is already default in many other ports. Robert gone an extra
>>>>> mile for you to make this dependency build-time rather than runtime.
>>>>>
>>>>> Start using Poudriere to build your own set of packages with options
>>>>> you want rather than going against the stream and putting more work on
>>>>> others.
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Your work on Chromium stuff is greatly appreciated, rnagy@
>>>>> P.S.S I wouldn't even bother to use bundled copy of pulseaudio libs if
>>>>> that adds more patches
>>>> You ignored main part:
>>>>
>>>> One of my installation of this port is on headless VM (2 VMs) for export
>>>> Draw.io diagrams to PDF. I don't need any sound on this VM.
>>>> Instead of leaving options in the port (what could be simpler?), each time
>>>> the port is updated, I will have to manually remove unnecessary
>>>> dependencies, add "GN_ARGS+=use_pulseaudio=false use_sndio=false" and add
>>>> option ALSA (for desktop ON, but for VM OFF).
>>>>
>>>> How I can build this port without dependency from all sound engines - alsa,
>>>> sndio and pulse for install it on headless VM?
>>>> Options was the solution! I don't understand who they were bothering?
>>> The www/chromium port is broken these days, just because several previously
>>> work well online web applications, such as zoom, slack, etc., don't work
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> I'd recommend to revert back all *audio*-related changes have been made to
>>> restore needful basic functionality.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>> Hello!
>>
>> Are we planning to enter the 2024Q3with broken *chromium?
> What is broken exactly? If someone can get me a proper list of packages installed
> and a complete description of the environment I can actually start looking into it.

All described above:

1. Impossible build without sound and with OSS only.
2. The www/chromium port is broken these days, just because several 
previously work well online web applications, such as zoom, slack, etc., 
don't work anymore.

-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir Druzenko