From nobody Wed May 31 11:43:53 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QWS8V02Bwz4YYxw; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from git@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QWS8T6gmjz3vqS; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from git@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1685533433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RpgRBaSG/2DsDwQee6MtQDIoxmRaAEWmTT+ObAuJGzQ=; b=WQlPzvg2eqlgEpW/9sNgGgVjVsBi/WrkBfzH0F5W1MUNNbKADMNeZ7Gl/bGT1xUGec6vsR kNyGopLxhpD7+8ilmvSSmNSjQ2xSI0zlx4/T4yIpp+IldrEqTEFiTbjoblrF92W5vA3TGp zWrDfDqCYWuhUpNslC3VCoNpcZzgSjMfRy9yNBja58q/SXE+UukG2wOVU3M7eWiKHxAAaO sYOCDA2HQDk5EZLjsU7KZRuJvOpiC98TD/lMfB6ORFCusSws3NoLLlcGlmeEJAaZ+KXz7h prZsp1ze+FLFls8Q1tlQwBkjjew5lsXNCi5OXGfAMvAMNQjdluy2K9XnyVoyYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1685533433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RpgRBaSG/2DsDwQee6MtQDIoxmRaAEWmTT+ObAuJGzQ=; b=ymBYJ2Sk1BVnhFD8ZDy0Sh55FIgSXA+q79Xd9mgcRwLI990ZvnKD4BbX7NOwro8nutUmm7 c3aLaZjiLJInWk/8tZVmlt1/OT3jidrImlSbvGD9YvHhCdHesDiyIfZQDjNGLtgwAUjT+A fgFOdzkiWurv/48VeDJxL1Jtsm1IzNmkBTqhNP+12r5z2yoiT4+xDQpT+ZpqNGv7xEIfhc AswPktU9EuDgnMEw1zfAkF1lT0gUS2+bCojdtLw0SOJsN3hlK6HXlxQT7cW5fEbBu+XdQW O5Xy1shPhl/dxuOjkkk7x5KVpoe6/iGwX3xoOrCy89QBG4+ac+Qu5TDlXK/Hgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1685533433; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ihlVsn/uyalk1F3OJWGsixkFVsQ1vfPhv0PpKQ+FbGjJ5bOT6bQAfoDWDvZ2gXgwFLi3j4 GqCWVYqPVwsCpNqAfMvbB3sngGpRa5FlfQggo4eWnfg6cAaB75+EtEvseKUfUz1G/ZPmi2 UEZme12F2tC6cKv7I9P1wYtVro5+oXRB7Mfw/5o54DygZlHQadIjwHB0wolZ0AV1Sz1EWR v2Cf9zdoMxmPsJubQZQqx5LESTU2kbKQLUyWlyZJ+S6l+tWMjR22MOCTtPkCPw5woDMusV aCcOPUzhWVyynFVArU4r+wiHKEPCqdIAO39zdDTAM6zYL2F3K5/kq9nWCDI4Ng== Received: from gitrepo.freebsd.org (gitrepo.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6068::e6a:5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QWS8T5mkkzY8L; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from git@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gitrepo.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.44]) by gitrepo.freebsd.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 34VBhr0Y060066; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:43:53 GMT (envelope-from git@gitrepo.freebsd.org) Received: (from git@localhost) by gitrepo.freebsd.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 34VBhr7p060065; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:43:53 GMT (envelope-from git) Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:43:53 GMT Message-Id: <202305311143.34VBhr7p060065@gitrepo.freebsd.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org From: Bernard Spil Subject: git: a19e99a33140 - main - security/openssl31: Security upate to 3.1.1 List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Git-Committer: brnrd X-Git-Repository: ports X-Git-Refname: refs/heads/main X-Git-Reftype: branch X-Git-Commit: a19e99a3314023c533185adb773476c8c24ee1aa Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N The branch main has been updated by brnrd: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=a19e99a3314023c533185adb773476c8c24ee1aa commit a19e99a3314023c533185adb773476c8c24ee1aa Author: Bernard Spil AuthorDate: 2023-05-31 11:43:23 +0000 Commit: Bernard Spil CommitDate: 2023-05-31 11:43:23 +0000 security/openssl31: Security upate to 3.1.1 Security: eb9a3c57-ff9e-11ed-a0d1-84a93843eb75 MFH: 2023Q2 --- security/openssl31/Makefile | 3 +- security/openssl31/distinfo | 6 +- security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 | 293 --------------------------- security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 | 126 ------------ security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 | 91 --------- 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 515 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/openssl31/Makefile b/security/openssl31/Makefile index 041bc222b9b3..71d3800638c1 100644 --- a/security/openssl31/Makefile +++ b/security/openssl31/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ PORTNAME= openssl -DISTVERSION= 3.1.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +DISTVERSION= 3.1.1 CATEGORIES= security devel MASTER_SITES= https://www.openssl.org/source/ \ ftp://ftp.cert.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/ diff --git a/security/openssl31/distinfo b/security/openssl31/distinfo index 656b8f558d0a..65be6f34f8a4 100644 --- a/security/openssl31/distinfo +++ b/security/openssl31/distinfo @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -TIMESTAMP = 1678808947 -SHA256 (openssl-3.1.0.tar.gz) = aaa925ad9828745c4cad9d9efeb273deca820f2cdcf2c3ac7d7c1212b7c497b4 -SIZE (openssl-3.1.0.tar.gz) = 15525381 +TIMESTAMP = 1685532140 +SHA256 (openssl-3.1.1.tar.gz) = b3aa61334233b852b63ddb048df181177c2c659eb9d4376008118f9c08d07674 +SIZE (openssl-3.1.1.tar.gz) = 15544757 diff --git a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 b/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 deleted file mode 100644 index 42c2da901f03..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,293 +0,0 @@ -From 28b69c9b4cf451655fe5aa5904294512fa4706c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell -Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:59:14 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Prepare for 3.1.1 - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Release: yes ---- - CHANGES.md | 4 ++++ - NEWS.md | 4 ++++ - VERSION.dat | 6 +++--- - 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 762f42e2c449..950390780ba1 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ OpenSSL Releases - OpenSSL 3.1 - ----------- - -+### Changes between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx] -+ -+ * none yet -+ - ### Changes between 3.0 and 3.1.0 [14 Mar 2023] - - * Add FIPS provider configuration option to enforce the -diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md -index 7846919675d5..c243c5e6818a 100644 ---- NEWS.md.orig -+++ NEWS.md -@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ OpenSSL Releases - OpenSSL 3.1 - ----------- - -+### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.1.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.1 [under development] -+ -+ * none -+ - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.0 [14 Mar 2023] - - * SSL 3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and DTLS 1.0 only work at security level 0. -From b15797a81a76fd62eedf3ffda91dcf5162b51184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli -Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:13:22 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] changes: note about policy tree size limits and circumvention - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20570) ---- - CHANGES.md | 9 ++++++++- - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 950390780ba1..99cabb3057fb 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -24,7 +24,14 @@ OpenSSL 3.1 - - ### Changes between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx] - -- * none yet -+ * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate -+ against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which -+ should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit -+ can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build -+ time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow -+ unlimited growth. -+ -+ *Paul Dale* - - ### Changes between 3.0 and 3.1.0 [14 Mar 2023] - -From 2017771e2db3e2b96f89bbe8766c3209f6a99545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli -Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints - -A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions -of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains -that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this -vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers -exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service -(DoS) attack on affected systems. - -Fixes CVE-2023-0464 - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20570) ---- - crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- - crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- - crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- - 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -index 18b53cc09ebf..cba107ca0358 100644 ---- crypto/x509/pcy_local.h.orig -+++ crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { - }; - - struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { -+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_count; -+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_maximum; -+ - /* This is the tree 'level' data */ - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; - int nlevel; -@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, - X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data); - void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); - int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, - const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -index 9d9a7ea1799c..450f95a655fb 100644 ---- crypto/x509/pcy_node.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data) - { - X509_POLICY_NODE *node; - -+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) -+ return NULL; -+ - node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); - if (node == NULL) { - ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); -@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - node->data = data; - node->parent = parent; -- if (level) { -+ if (level != NULL) { - if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { - if (level->anyPolicy) - goto node_error; -@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -- if (tree) { -+ if (extra_data) { - if (tree->extra_data == NULL) - tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); - if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ -@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -+ tree->node_count++; - if (parent) - parent->nchild++; - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -index fa45da5117a1..f953a05a41a6 100644 ---- crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ - - #include "pcy_local.h" - -+/* -+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to -+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. -+ * -+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the -+ * door on CVE-2023-0464. -+ */ -+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX -+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 -+#endif -+ - static void expected_print(BIO *channel, - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node, - int indent) -@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - } - -+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; -+ - /* - * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. - * -@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL, - OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) - goto bad_tree; -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { - ossl_policy_data_free(data); - goto bad_tree; - } -@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise - */ - static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) -+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; - int i, matched = 0; -@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); - - if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - matched = 1; - } - } - if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. - */ - static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) -+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - int i; - -@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); - - /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ -- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) -+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ - data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; - data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { - ossl_policy_data_free(data); - return 0; - } -@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ - if (last->anyPolicy && - ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, -- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - return 1; - } -@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, - extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS - | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; - node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, -- tree); -+ tree, 1); - } - if (!tree->user_policies) { - tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); -@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - - for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { - cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert); -- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) -+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - - if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) diff --git a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 b/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 deleted file mode 100644 index 3873133819b7..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,126 +0,0 @@ -From 07d8baf3367cbbf81877510e5102e6193da4bfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell -Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:31:25 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Updated CHANGES.md and NEWS.md for CVE-2023-0465 - -Also updated the entries for CVE-2023-0464 - -Related-to: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20586) ---- - CHANGES.md | 12 ++++++++++++ - NEWS.md | 6 +++++- - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 99cabb3057fb..511886d213f9 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -24,12 +24,22 @@ OpenSSL 3.1 - - ### Changes between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx] - -+ * Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are -+ silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped -+ for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert -+ invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the -+ certificate altogether. -+ ([CVE-2023-0465]) -+ -+ *Matt Caswell* -+ - * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate - against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which - should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit - can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build - time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow - unlimited growth. -+ ([CVE-2023-0464]) - - *Paul Dale* - -@@ -19689,6 +19699,8 @@ ndif - - - -+[CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 -+[CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 - [CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286 - [CVE-2023-0217]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0217 -diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md -index c243c5e6818a..23f918f604ea 100644 ---- NEWS.md.orig -+++ NEWS.md -@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ OpenSSL 3.1 - - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.1.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.1 [under development] - -- * none -+ * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates -+ ([CVE-2023-0465]) -+ * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) - - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.0 [14 Mar 2023] - -@@ -1446,6 +1448,8 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.x - * Support for various new platforms - - -+[CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 -+[CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 - [CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286 - [CVE-2023-0217]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0217 -From facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell -Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf - certs - -Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we -later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf -cert was bad. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20586) ---- - crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -index 9384f1da9bad..a0282c3ef121 100644 ---- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) - goto memerr; - /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { -- int i; -+ int i, cbcalled = 0; - - /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ -- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { -+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { - X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); - -+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0) -+ cbcalled = 1; - CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0, - ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); - } -+ if (!cbcalled) { -+ /* Should not be able to get here */ -+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); -+ return 0; -+ } -+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ - return 1; - } - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { diff --git a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 b/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 deleted file mode 100644 index c115bacd1089..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,91 +0,0 @@ -From fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Tomas Mraz -Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() - -The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0466 - -Reviewed-by: Paul Dale -Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20562) ---- - CHANGES.md | 8 ++++++++ - NEWS.md | 2 ++ - doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++-- - 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 511886d213f9..dc701f0388de 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ OpenSSL 3.1 - - ### Changes between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx] - -+ * Corrected documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() to mention -+ that it does not enable policy checking. Thanks to David Benjamin for -+ discovering this issue. -+ ([CVE-2023-0466]) -+ -+ *Tomáš Mráz* -+ - * Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are - silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped - for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert -@@ -19699,6 +19706,7 @@ ndif - - - -+[CVE-2023-0466]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0466 - [CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 - [CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 -diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md -index 23f918f604ea..9477662c822d 100644 ---- NEWS.md.orig -+++ NEWS.md -@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ OpenSSL 3.1 - - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.1.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.1 [under development] - -+ * Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() ([CVE-2023-0466]) - * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates - ([CVE-2023-0465]) - * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) -@@ -1448,6 +1449,7 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.x - * Support for various new platforms - - -+[CVE-2023-0466]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0466 - [CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 - [CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 -diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -index 20aea99b5b3a..fcbbfc4c3067 100644 ---- doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod.orig -+++ doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B. - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B to - B. Normally the current time is used. - --X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled --by default) and adds B to the acceptable policy set. -+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B to the acceptable policy set. -+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable -+policy checking. - - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled - by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B. Any existing -@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i. - The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(), - and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0. - -+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as -+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this. -+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation. -+ - =head1 COPYRIGHT - - Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.