Re: git: 18c6e1827669 - main - Mk/**ruby.mk: Switch from USE_RUBY=yes to USES=ruby

From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 04:59:56 UTC
On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 03:24:58 +0100
Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> > On Jan 15, 2023, at 2:32 AM, Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > 
> > This broke INDEX build, but by single left-behind.
> > 
> > Adapting irc/iroffer-dinoex to the updated framework should fix the
> > issue, as commenting out it from irc/Makefile fixes the INDEX build.
> > 
> > The error messages are as follows:
> > 
> > --- describe.x11-wm ---
> > make_index: /usr/ports/irc/iroffer-dinoex: no entry
> > for /usr/ports/libruby.so: Done.
> > failed to generate INDEX!
> > 
> > As this is a huge commits, temporarily unhooking irc/iroffer-dinoex
> > from irc/Makefile until it is fixed would be better workaround than
> > reverting, if the fix is not easy.
> > 
> > 
> >> The branch main has been updated by bofh:
> >> 
> >> URL:
> > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=18c6e18276691edf5274406bf82a3b06792ff9ae
> >> 
> >> commit 18c6e18276691edf5274406bf82a3b06792ff9ae
> >> Author:     Muhammad Moinur Rahman <bofh@FreeBSD.org>
> >> AuthorDate: 2023-01-14 23:05:28 +0000
> >> Commit:     Muhammad Moinur Rahman <bofh@FreeBSD.org>
> >> CommitDate: 2023-01-14 23:08:33 +0000
> >> 
> >>    Mk/**ruby.mk: Switch from USE_RUBY=yes to USES=ruby
> >> 
> >>    Switch from Mk/bsd.ruby.mk to Mk/Uses/ruby.mk
> >> 
> >>    Notable changes are.
> >> 
> >>    - Mk/bsd.ruby.mk is moved to Mk/Uses/ruby.mk.
> >>    - USE_RUBY=yes is replaced with USES=ruby.
> >>    - USE_RUBY_EXTCONF is replaced with USES=ruby:extconf.
> >>    - USE_RUBY_RDOC is replaced with USES=ruby:rdoc.
> >>    - USE_RUBY_SETUP is replaces with USES=ruby:setup.
> >>    - RUBY_NO_BUILD_DEPENDS and RUBY_NO_RUN_DEPENDS are replaced with
> >>      USES=ruby:{build,none,run}.
> >>    - RUBY_REQUIRE isn't used anywhere, so removed.
> >>    - USES=gem now implies USES=ruby.
> >> 
> >>    This is mainly the work of yasu@ at
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27863
> >>    I have just made some cosmetic changes and ran exp-run to test that
> > the
> >>    tree is not in a BROKEN state.
> >> 
> >>    Approved by:    portmgr
> >>    Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37925
> >> ---
> > 
> > --
> > Tomoaki AOKI    <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
> 
> There are couple more. Regenerating INDEX. Updated commit coming soon.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Moin

Thanks!
Confirmed fixed at commit 2d00178fd4d952c698d3413800c3bd1b6cfc98a9.


Regards.

-- 
Tomoaki AOKI   <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>