Re: git: 9204a735d9a8 - main - net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3.

On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 04:36, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:31:24AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
>> On 1/25/22 11:17, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> >      net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3.

>> * 'Storj' - port name repeated

> Only because I'm forced to prepend stupid "cat/port" patch which I strip
> locally when browsing commits: this information is redundant as it can be
> inferred from the commit itself.

By that logic it is also stupid to put 'Storj' in the message, since it
can also be extracted from the commit itself.  Using that same logic
it's also stupid to put 'update to version 1.47.3', since it can also be
extracted from the commit.

What not just write

net/storj: update to 1.47.3

rather than

net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3.?

The first message is concise, conveys the same information, and follows
a formatting standard, which makes browsing and searching commits
easier.