Re: git: 8ecb1f814114 - main - Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0"
- In reply to: Piotr Kubaj : "Re: git: 8ecb1f814114 - main - Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0""
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:56:01 UTC
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:42:09PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 22-08-25 15:24:12, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:21:28PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > On 22-08-25 14:08:26, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:50:30AM +0000, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > > > The branch main has been updated by pkubaj: > > > > > > > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > > > > > > commit 8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > Author: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> > > > > > AuthorDate: 2022-08-25 10:29:24 +0000 > > > > > Commit: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> > > > > > CommitDate: 2022-08-25 10:49:36 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" > > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit f36cc819accadae1fefc14c203e5fbe9c74e1492. > > > > > > > > > > I asked for an exp-run for powerpc and powerpc64 on a recently provided > > > > > cluster machine but got no reply. > > > > > > > > > > PR: 265915 > > > > > > > > You cannot take the decision to revert on your own for many reasons: > > > > > > > > 1. etiquete: we ask people to actually revert if needed and escalate if they > > > > don't, we never revert directly ourself! the only one allowed to do "rude" revert > > > > are people taking care of the package building when something break the delivery > > > > of packages for Tier 1 > > > I did it myself so that users don't upgrade in the meantime, since that > > > would create further confusion. If I let it wait, then PORTEPOCH should > > > have been bumped for all the affected ports, which I think we all agree > > > would be troublesome. > > > > No what will happen is given it works on Tier1, the Tier2 will fix one by one > > the issues that raised if any without reverting, meaning no PORTEPOCH would be > > needed. > > Isn't it better to fix issues BEFORE committing? Yes if possible in a timely manner, but again this is the life of Tier 2 to be best effort support. And again the problem here is the behaviour, the driven by revert by a committer of the work of another committer, this is not acceptable and have never been accepted in the project. Best regards, Bapt