From nobody Tue Nov 04 08:27:19 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4d11m00kKLz6FMvS; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4d11m006Gmz3PTL; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelo@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1762244848; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8QeX5/v31DivxErdaOXqA+she5PZbNkqtiyQvSMiyaQ=; b=At/Z5tkePU0FwySzVEgQYcJHYIFNmgE98VA6H8H7HisGaNK5DIAzLSA6LEQM7Qq23J8TcN NoBcGeYvpqQf0vnapjbkI9entz3sRNF+TAo6BuLSYEQ5taiJQ8JVMDf6Mba7wg8WG3hNCw HC5u10w1mvkJubedG9PKDZNFym85xeSLAlPBbbdSzT2Rnx+PT0NbKJFYV+WUjV7WdQBOR/ evqCULijy1IeELzlYh1oW2H0BqjMhSM/57YsUwnHGHECNIpGPYjKL89YvxcnyYgidgHCbW SHNg1POsBrMyRSZTgSZmDdnMEz7NrRoD4MDw8Xrbn292OSlGgjH0p9Yv2RL1WQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1762244848; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8QeX5/v31DivxErdaOXqA+she5PZbNkqtiyQvSMiyaQ=; b=aAHIJTD/sXpc6+W/J9dG6vLsaAKCz/xOyKW8lyBMeTXILo0jrPFZeJP44P/HytO28+hud9 a5MBm6ckLxORsL26VPUuY6ukhc2kEs2HacltqnAMXjSrFvqFlHlbaIlAlH2AAkS2f3Ct/Q 2r/b6TzKlpLz/ZihynpzFgUUp7OoH/OnwzaMNxZbUZlrEGX/VhP41GGAIqQCHsQgvGec+I kp2JA9uWxP0Pw5DtMQm95g6JddRj769Z7jUxQuHHY1H8dnEYQrKqjRD3BgXXNfAQuhpK8z zP6BBWlj6mWcsraDUQkTl2AVRHJS+0SnkDrOsG9E//roAZ6buZ0+Ckt086V/jg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1762244848; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=b5GOw3ZjcmT8QrxNTYv8AjdNGhuNT5UzzTB3Wo2xLg4vw9Kqsi+giQQxf2qJFcsH6SDuYm iRbl9ASOr4ukFsY8mlDDCVMpfrLqgQYBIue8MhO/gSgyjNgOAT3Lx02gEoQGuCFcK3AklR ARvmEBd+zmJZnifvBNo8ZvafyChps0AGMfdp+YBIIENSq/53PR57OuO9rxxFd0nDNDt5Ve NFqOG4EnRpsJcpLi+a1SlLSXbepOXesp4AJ3HJ6DGCsSuDqq0mZjuzR60Qe9ovxA2hanF+ hOwACrGc5ngZO+C7MqRTI801c9IebhEke+eV3xW7FTSHTfmQx3uVpJVFf8Ic6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from [192.168.1.23] (unknown [170.85.2.206]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: michaelo/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4d11lz1520zHL4; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:27:19 +0100 List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Thunderbird Daily Subject: Re: git: 9ddf7a912155 - main - devel/uv: Make the selected TLS provider use the system default truststore To: Gleb Popov Cc: Adam Weinberger , Yuri Victorovich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org References: <202511030828.5A38Si1d096849@gitrepo.freebsd.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Michael Osipov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2025-11-04 09:18, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11:17 PM Michael Osipov wrote: >> >> That's actually my work. While %%LOCALBASE%% sounds tempting the >> downstream patch will go way as soon as the upstream patch has been >> accepted [1]. >> >> [1] https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Frustls%2Fopenssl-probe%2Fpull%2F39&data=05%7C02%7Cmichael.osipov%40innomotics.com%7Ca5259b70fe3e4da69e3308de1b7ae594%7C698c6ffb74e34a84be68f22d8d3201a3%7C0%7C0%7C638978411805542809%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=z%2BACtH2FSFGgU6wjP2DULkBDkZ7pD2GVv9yvr8RLHsA%3D&reserved=0 > > The upstream patch also hardcodes "/usr/local", this isn't really correct. You are absolutely right, but that is something I cannot solve upstream and patching tens of ports which uses openssl-probe isn't a solution either. If you can propose something for my upstream patch, please do. Yet another problem is that uv does not care about the ports, it builds isolated. This is why I have created [1] which will require ports for wheels, but haven't really received a response, but from vishwin@. > grep -r --include=Makefile.crates openssl-probe- . -l | cut -f 2-3 -d gives me 102 ports. M [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D53433