From nobody Wed Aug 20 17:30:01 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c6YP56xcQz64kSg; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c6YP567rwz4DGk; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1755711001; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ub5Ur8Whzqek7IaxURbqm4txO2u9SPlPMVGmNxpis6Y=; b=qz7aqwDDfe7NI1vsbX30FQPEFaONlZtXjJ4PkENqeHymXoBk78G7Aft6V5L4MQKY5sF1Mf /iMe0b5IeaXtgGs0V0FZEUy7zLjqtLpr3whWbASoC0PF6t+C1E9NGxqlIEc1VkO9By0jFP uFHIyiz6K4t6NdV7TS3pzUDlKzUsIxA9ZXVL8/CKP2xYQTht5hPTSnHO6h1IKsi1Ke3QY6 EkwpAW22YeIJBT5DRr8fzQLxu0hgG/0t4p/q8fab+xg64ZsxHhqo7cM90dZRpLIF7hfUeE GcwgTe4XDCwK0GVrPgTlCeJW0L34ZnhpVLOvQyMdmHetMR7W8C39t/24eXCWGw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1755711001; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ub5Ur8Whzqek7IaxURbqm4txO2u9SPlPMVGmNxpis6Y=; b=UzbUYkYXyVsBcWACCpiDS8IG7UQs/GlhiI0S45fIoh7fkQdnQPFi0RUc6EvEJoy/yXDj3P bbjjCrcwg1KdS2bJ1RhhRbVsPptHJY7ub2OAqEoQBIoaQObq9vq9ogcbyOkg67FYCK4u8a 6bpoOkCyN+BS7CBOuHO+gBd9lej1/CyljSJzBpJ0bConMOXnr6hpbvEYTiHSpRMvfxj7Ib wyyyjp6Vq0AhuK24Bkg51WqvF3lKqPJZj/xY0ojHsqrnXeR5u9wWH0YxYtCCeK9dqhGDec rbFlCIeZIKCAgv0596hPxAwRfjYyib+s6CUrKrUWACFZJEr0GTRyL4jW33I3uw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1755711001; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HLrHFlSp1bunnZ+Oz/38qNWKoqZ1IPl88v1Eno0qC6hwWooRq9vDUKjhK//UxiXQdw0idU ZOPtdF4OGBDmFzxUHCZQR2Bp/UGaEbUE6jwh3bVGb5v2U3Z0B+YdpZqbLk3c5Q2UDnlW8i wcstM0t1W+IUmlvjh0VkwtXj82Xcp4DdAi/+n/O924vfS7+QR8Bq8hjJ2I+iCWFuJ9J73E g40c+gW5FFEn2fe+vvU+HsZCP03GSyZ/JGpGoc8YY+2N+0Yypwn+ThFxGF1asCp/97SyYK N3vZrLXksR4y7ovXN1qDCBO9SHxpz6DE7X7t3c+g/cFeFIkdHX8pk3pUSeYnCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975) id A5866EBF; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:30:01 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Daniel Engberg Cc: Moin Rahman , ports-committers , dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 1559e70f1eab - main - databases/redis-devel: Update version 8.0.2.20250630=>8.0.3.20250731 Message-ID: References: <202508190646.57J6k0Ko092124@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <5A1A67A0-5DEF-45A3-A2E5-9F658DCA16EE@freebsd.org> <31009a6e-d7c3-423b-ac75-839f49cad01c@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31009a6e-d7c3-423b-ac75-839f49cad01c@FreeBSD.org> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 06:35:41PM +0200, Daniel Engberg wrote: > On 2025-08-20 17:22, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 04:34:06PM +0200, Moin Rahman wrote: > > > > On Aug 20, 2025, at 15:07, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, my understanding is databases/redis-devel needs to be pointed > > > > into the unstable branch of the project, > > > > https://github.com/redis/redis/commits/unstable/. > > > > Is there any objections on that? > > > According to your understanding where do you think the current dist is coming > > > from? > > Well, if it comes from the right place, why is that still 8.0? > > It should be at least 8.2, right or no? > > I think the "confusion/expectation" is about the concept that -devel needs > to be bleeding edge. Thanks, Daniel. Yes, it was like that when I created that port. > That isn't necessarily always the case especially when > upstream have multiple active branches. Adding to that bofh@ has already > mentioned that he hasn't been able to test bleeding edge yet which is why it > still tracks the 8.0-branch. Well, the port name should be something like databases/redis80-devel then, right? > We already have quite a few "drive-by" commits and if we want to maintain > some kind of quality committing untested version > bumps/patches isn't the way to go. Thank you. -- Sergey A. Osokin