From nobody Wed Feb 07 18:09:13 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TVSmq4XGMz59pW3; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TVSmq3n3sz4jB2; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelo@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1707329355; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=w4uv2zb0WfNlJIOU2GMUDNxLMqnAnpq1PRjlfZH5mpc=; b=Tk4Ay37D8GWbl3G/Up+Vof+hnLT+43k6WVlMO84iHz7+UQp/Ps5k5i/hu0EAmQpEi7sb4A 7MzNvB1tLn15n/sMkDdTI0wRK0ub+Bvn9YfmA0Gz6eGwhgEnoNRXEVThRmnNvF4svWyP3L 0bGw4snO15FNY6wmDVrUToXBmy4hEzmhwp/9coQtvvQjU1Obt6IH/3gAp6EMUAom/HdyAp zNxyhP+/F0iXd4F/Cqzav+pA3rhKHJNbdv8xgxnanrZ980l3+HLQon3Rnh7wc7CHQoRUD/ skJsGXJrzEPc3PeU+FdkwNSWcY1ez1nKr2XXUE3nLE64GOSxxFT9s8Jv5CUW8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1707329355; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=w4uv2zb0WfNlJIOU2GMUDNxLMqnAnpq1PRjlfZH5mpc=; b=HWkOTsCJTJ8L2KDE0wtS4wRsM6itivrak/lnLZag7ejo+s/ZWdedgGo1NnPCP9BlfRDxUH a/7w67rbViSsqCWzq8INpEldb8a8pZAyutSnNv3w0LNmvowHqrtVbKHb8RO7uNKAfmlNaM e+1VsgxFrScmeFzNwGD09FC/26VgrLTW6CwFQjfWnxcyK5KyHC9QYSSIe5ojK/9r9ba91p i1D8AYt8T4fDF21bAdmcXSlLqeBIB7zkR2wqPD+NUVn290TiPAQsPQS4Koz8wJDsnLevoZ u2hLLMH5KKqc7McLrvLygwPyhYJP0YqqzGJJuvkjSyyaqxh0jiUyUuhL+w4Dkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1707329355; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mOBLJ3wA+VOLwfMfPrp/TdFMQ5dykaulAQipeikX+Qr7rP4QxPRVctqBzU+V9NJRMgw8T+ XTTuDCDp7OZOOzJfNwEwhNZcdeh/nR/GOdtuTOOn1MmknoKKWyv8uKMlBLfP+Yxi5lzucg 34yM1cd8lUzq9xW4T6ILsxLw6t2d7pvBEhWtvcfUf/BW2tQ7lRm9Fabhc/+I1iTk/uaKzM Le+mqFxvhii0hek0M4jLGlNMjEvw6xOURqFKN2LwpNjmRJkKbqBYXGgFAOYhFKBrSxcgPw 4xhgXQJXS+yjiYz7ImKpdckdqHgUrQhBSz+mwdYxfIC3oG6H5MlroCMZAQthHw== Received: from [192.168.1.23] (unknown [165.225.26.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: michaelo/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TVSmp5wkLz1LRw; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <16f9baa7-1e25-49d9-9f31-0aafd528250a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 19:09:13 +0100 List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Thunderbird Daily Subject: Re: git: ece1cb52e7ff - main - security/sssd: mark port deprecated To: John Hixson Cc: Gleb Popov , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org References: <202402030553.4135rFLH050086@gitrepo.freebsd.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Michael Osipov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2024-02-07 19:00, John Hixson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: >> On 2024-02-03 07:25, Gleb Popov wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 8:53 AM John Hixson wrote: >>>> >>>> The branch main has been updated by jhixson: >>>> >>>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=ece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c8ed659c5974ef1c0088d >>>> >>>> commit ece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c8ed659c5974ef1c0088d >>>> Author: John Hixson >>>> AuthorDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000 >>>> Commit: John Hixson >>>> CommitDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000 >>>> >>>> security/sssd: mark port deprecated >>>> >>>> - Very old version of this port no longer supported >>>> - sssd-devel has current versions >>> >>> Why not just update this port to the devel version? >> >> I agree with Gleb. This is unnecessarily confusing and many will likely >> refuse to use a -devel port in production. Other ports do have regular ports >> and real -devel ports as well. For me, this violates POLA somewhat. >> >> M > > What is the proper route to take here? sssd-devel isn't really a "devel" > port. It's just the up to date version of sssd. The current sssd port is > very old (like 5 years or more). I would like to just replace it with > the new version but don't want to force an update for anyone who may > rely on it. Should sssd-devel be renamed sssd2 and sssd be renamed sssd1 > or some such? What is this POLA that I am possibly violating by the way? I see your point it is partially valid to me. I'd expect sssd-devel to form off a non-release version, namely a Git hash. As for security/sssd: Almost just like you said. Deprecate and introduce security/sssd2. Very similar to what security/krb5* or security/openssl* are don't. That scheme would resemble. I wouldn't touch security/sssd in terms of renaming anymore. When sssd 3 comes out, you can have another parallel port for that. POLA violation for me is that an apparently valid port is replaced with a devel one. Michael