From nobody Wed Feb 07 18:00:20 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TVSZg6xZfz59njx; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.jhixson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TVSZf6VLwz4h5w; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.jhixson@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd.jhixson@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd.jhixson@gmail.com Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-296edb72feaso355770a91.3; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 10:00:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707328824; x=1707933624; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8BhoJ+/bQt6Xvb52j0pKVLiwg7RtJHeXlfDkYBI8RS4=; b=JDBz/Qfm1dtDOYPsUViucZQYoaGaXQ/aka2CZL/ioV1j/YhU5yYxit6dP8IvEtVbJ1 m899/XB4R7yOxUi5hFGUgp+Up18OYPbPitDs8GabhbHaimCZ2R2qv6zSH9q9HZx+sSxL FMnahDQMGtMFL67C4mbBlZPBbOQBRNcfhVh4KAPBTkNR7QcsoxljiwmS/PC4UaICKaPL J83B5e8jL6jSCqw+mM4k1PK0TJUFa40A0twYn2hHQ7zY3suDreAHSyn7u6gHs5XjWrCi XtQ/ywFT9VZTWkjDK/Z2ZVOx11JzcluzR2zlvgfkdgOqGErHrMC+6Doq+bn1v1v2Uyk6 I0Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzsox3A44BLEqMkkFNVawnZvBh1JfLRLEG3NJ+Pr0Cc1AFuimF2 GfUPzNN7JEhHMOF2MKEPooLZdKNXrEz4dMyvCFsW/eUwcexS8PvLbqAVmnNa1Jw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUcjioWEKiXnFCHqj9k6YyAi1LQbdTb5+m7+eb9zuArxJyYzkMmIzRYXc+yfdKKcedOUx1rg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bf0d:b0:296:d666:c2c3 with SMTP id c13-20020a17090abf0d00b00296d666c2c3mr3451720pjs.15.1707328823789; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 10:00:23 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVyszAOKUOf/685J42hSLBjNhamrJZ7D7e/l49ux1ooiH0xa8ISmeFyvoiWhlngrGnf8XTfZF4W4Eow2Cqwr9++zY9ABPMfPXvPKQvnqRcHvxG/bpY+y+xc9PWlgilEZdwCNF8AuYlthVm2HU/91bz3uPCqxpkOtvYKdQgfvwHbND8LnLgIxkxBRvMJWTq119wEBaE= Received: from FreeBSD.org ([2001:470:801d:1::31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ee13-20020a17090afc4d00b0029082d10fc4sm1999347pjb.39.2024.02.07.10.00.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Feb 2024 10:00:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:00:20 -0800 From: John Hixson To: Michael Osipov Cc: Gleb Popov , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: git: ece1cb52e7ff - main - security/sssd: mark port deprecated Message-ID: References: <202402030553.4135rFLH050086@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pllxqk7473fvjtux" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.60 / 15.00]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jhixson@freebsd.org,freebsdjhixson@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM,none]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[209.85.216.51:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.216.51:from]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jhixson@freebsd.org,freebsdjhixson@gmail.com]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TVSZf6VLwz4h5w --pllxqk7473fvjtux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > On 2024-02-03 07:25, Gleb Popov wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 8:53=E2=80=AFAM John Hixson wrote: > > >=20 > > > The branch main has been updated by jhixson: > > >=20 > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3Dece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c= 8ed659c5974ef1c0088d > > >=20 > > > commit ece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c8ed659c5974ef1c0088d > > > Author: John Hixson > > > AuthorDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000 > > > Commit: John Hixson > > > CommitDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000 > > >=20 > > > security/sssd: mark port deprecated > > >=20 > > > - Very old version of this port no longer supported > > > - sssd-devel has current versions > >=20 > > Why not just update this port to the devel version? >=20 > I agree with Gleb. This is unnecessarily confusing and many will likely > refuse to use a -devel port in production. Other ports do have regular po= rts > and real -devel ports as well. For me, this violates POLA somewhat. >=20 > M What is the proper route to take here? sssd-devel isn't really a "devel" port. It's just the up to date version of sssd. The current sssd port is very old (like 5 years or more). I would like to just replace it with the new version but don't want to force an update for anyone who may rely on it. Should sssd-devel be renamed sssd2 and sssd be renamed sssd1 or some such? What is this POLA that I am possibly violating by the way? Thanks, - John --pllxqk7473fvjtux Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEJaAswQZQMflCdCA6RqljBb/iPUAFAmXDxTRfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDI1 QTAyQ0MxMDY1MDMxRjk0Mjc0MjAzQTQ2QTk2MzA1QkZFMjNENDAACgkQRqljBb/i PUBonBAAqY6VQq3gT8mASEaZ0jC0vM75dfHFOvgk3dsLdOb161TdO8LzV0YZLkKn s97IK64JqgIJHbXpZMX/fJeeWkPV6WJo28BkGQGTt5mS9ELFVaXQ03mUCQcEI3Ns RKL3YJadkrM9nXes78owaHLxzq5seYeIBjr6FrvwgNsHyzQPGbBGCo9kYWgtMXeW FdGKdX0uTDwm3XMvTajGx/bP1c7L0xHlOZkaTlSiVYKP7rCXYGYyZlxLbd9YsWtd YGGX+Y84QWciuW3D4EX+rc6jV1xgnUIG3F9vqccwE+DTzXcWq/FUKvvm8HtGyTA1 Mw242d6PQq4gT2X+Q2pyZgvSrv+Yllost834/xHWnSnQoh6GHfZFmBjUQF0ZdoOu r3ZCbwqvRRMjC1un0uWMK3CakC9rTunOUhwmCnWytWdUhqvjvXGsJwtfpmV+qUUM 5FmpWbt5vpNw+k+nSoxOgvNuh1ddlLndgOJG9dVrzLjTHjt1oe8+00xdeq603zTu gaJN0HOdd1A3a2RIHeV9RsXTXL2wOUTsRA2Ulz030LUT/GP16JP6nLQMdIGuGfDW d6V/1jw7UlU/LvU2ghUM7aMWVZ6ukYM325xkEWJx0/20845QQWc6gYXtlHdBr1V6 D6Vq+C2P1YOVjddIQUp6lUs1tAWZmhY6H4Zez8Thpo89Kyid5No= =A8PI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pllxqk7473fvjtux--