From nobody Wed Sep 13 05:55:48 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RlqSw6G0pz4tBsM; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 05:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-f53.google.com (mail-vs1-f53.google.com [209.85.217.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RlqSw4gByz4J8L; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 05:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-vs1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-450f5be2532so66975137.3; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:56:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694584575; x=1695189375; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zgJDgg9T+OWPqNTtk7Vy8OtE29shZitLuXmmkofgBFU=; b=NamTjx5OCGNwHPNbf7ywBA99Me0OnagciDShqUfWGUSvDUv+0Q0zA1Qy9q+S8c7kEq Zky6yrn1uKO+A3UILu5kTnh+d7oU1j+lxaqC7paAi5miP+2S54xEdkGNcT2QiXUQ7ibW iRSI/ebAzJTtNACShpSGU4/sLOKI7hn7VVGcVKCmxZ0unH5QRnYoKWVActxLUvnFlKNL VtJ3OmCGH6KmUgMQNjwkIEWmrE4ixgS2DUf36u9rrDXnffnNX2XqAdVzM2XzJHLR8JaY qIR2xle0YHHJaH4cmI4uFVMwwCqSey2qoBPdkYxq916sxmj2ej09WSAsCUhhtPijeqtB LBFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YziAoC6gpazKEg/23JKnNqQUhNWCkhdw+SFVSAX3K1Lt8tL3nb2 UrmbP49BV+oGWgkUGZZDPXtKbZCQydk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmfzsTC5gKRpjeqYtpj+cqJhcE3MXhXzRybzyHds41ry8c0xno34JljvQqX8ST/c1qTWgT5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a67:bb03:0:b0:44e:a2ee:8408 with SMTP id m3-20020a67bb03000000b0044ea2ee8408mr1722995vsn.23.1694584575276; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk1-f177.google.com (mail-vk1-f177.google.com. [209.85.221.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11-20020a056102358b00b0044d5ca61496sm1915345vsu.0.2023.09.12.22.56.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4935f87ca26so2335522e0c.3; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:56:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1f:c442:0:b0:48f:8891:2967 with SMTP id u63-20020a1fc442000000b0048f88912967mr1832535vkf.0.1694584574711; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:56:14 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202309130518.38D5INm2018105@gitrepo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <202309130518.38D5INm2018105@gitrepo.freebsd.org> From: Gleb Popov Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:55:48 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 4df0e66a3662 - main - llvm.mk: add export/noexport to handle CC/CXX/CPP exports To: "Tobias C. Berner" Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RlqSw4gByz4J8L On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 8:20=E2=80=AFAM Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > + USES=3Dllvm.mk now supports 'export' (default) and 'noexport' argument= s. > + When export is set, CC, CXX and CPP will be set to the path correspond= ing > + to the chosen llvm-version. The choice for the default seems strange to me. Now every port that has USES=3Dllvm will be switching to building with a non-base compiler. Is this really a sensible default?