From nobody Wed Mar 01 09:37:56 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PRTgj067yz3vdyJ; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 09:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PRTgh3SfYz4G3j; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id f17so3234765uax.7; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 01:38:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1677663503; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=EBU4f1WY3gbtDpd7ceFIK5pU4sxYPgFtGH1MDMSIwC4=; b=ehOgO3RZVQq8AdZRc4nsegMBUExEoP/5FvcWcxEbdfcxV4xB729PY+R+Ko2uGBAVoN GpxPXI59tMMD2Xk0GAcYwk0i8ZmN5PGE2NvCoCk7DnSzKaij61jJU4mk0k6z2J7XW04Z TJH0Hhf17VvoFyDuXrSXa+QDz+ww8I8EyG0GSqiHTIKgFoFMdsnwRAGs4hvHyvpdf5s/ KJ0e1AVr2iKpfhw4eYAcCuUieDmeqDJx84sYlmFRnAhXaujvzKHL/yXF+fMLRcpdmKLr gUuIU/Z2EfgL8z/MhTlFXz52Tjvkaf19MYceTVtUeipTfslyrwZPCShLPYfl4xiogAVh /f2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677663503; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EBU4f1WY3gbtDpd7ceFIK5pU4sxYPgFtGH1MDMSIwC4=; b=rBIjUwLeGWuc3DmZdTv7b7GNTvx7URMJd/Z+TzSL1itSst9TVsZwrqwTpKuFIMnm/q MqtZ5/cTYv4FvuDolSPeqVADqJ3Q/LKGhxaSRjVnO9MnIJktIr2UXd6C1f3slla+/G4I dRNk1kFZo7AuFf1IN1oaZYsJQk2KkxbrClQ3eeCDbSxXllZ+983T7ZfiejqGonN1rqzA JXm9HpkbloZHg8hiyk6/predBbfTTglOFsmmMj2eAITpwqmYyL+apUPtlf9eBs/0jkvQ VuXoZNRCL0MrHsGRD8cdSqnWf/WGOA6n3AShGp1OrkIwle0j9JQdUyiBZl8gzizwwnQm hWfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWtNdvPGNJTmd+QfxtWIRaNZVYY5h2WFutkLaep/mOvcjCX97qj 7s2KmtGiR6chMWrpjzU6Roo6R5eVj0xj9zLIv6E7n6Zd X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/X6Y8DTkSaN+83YMFMIDvgEl8yw2FnAySBYsXlGJKs62Pqkzbc6MTfWi064zD1Z0xzfPUgkOtVgT/vhkOsorA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:2172:b0:401:8c72:4cf4 with SMTP id j18-20020a056122217200b004018c724cf4mr3034246vkr.1.1677663503266; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 01:38:23 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202302272105.31RL593a014619@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20230228075455.b7otamo7ezahtqxi@aniel.nours.eu> <20230301081506.yjkbquftisgdb4f5@aniel.nours.eu> In-Reply-To: <20230301081506.yjkbquftisgdb4f5@aniel.nours.eu> From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 12:37:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: a9d9d3a42723 - main - lang/python: Revert "add bytecode trigger" To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Matthias Andree , Charlie Li , "Tobias C. Berner" , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PRTgh3SfYz4G3j X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:15=E2=80=AFAM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > ... > On the other side I saw your revert without prior benevolent message (lik= e the > example above), Maybe we should have some policy for this? Like, "large reverts should be sanctioned/performed by portmgr"?