From nobody Sun Dec 31 01:07:42 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4T2gvf5WMgz55jZb; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 01:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T2gvf4gM7z3NN9; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 01:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1703984862; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YregPaGd05qcwiiU/MjEzjxcE1yomp2RmTGw7WDgjpA=; b=cBJIxU1s1wXIEiPwufXLglL/Bolune5Ed4gisHocmGIkxOXFFD7HIlsTVzRON+d2wbQUER uWH7LxHDBm7fO9xWLHr+PrwDOQwv3v2BOv0Rn+b1QXe/NEj/kXVJxtEzF8h1ELrncffHvf uFBzEnTfFnAtyg4LxJFh1TlckdioG9ztMkwR0cR2apM65W/CRxvSO2tFlOBbaoSdhwNjoZ wc7vLFsnA6+opRGEfWYUDZRLqTXFrhd2YiCI3BmkPgWiCuZo7NV7TYpjy5pUruQDY+Dexo 1qbYOOIrb/guqgFDbsDDdZzpRVOXSnpaU9jxGcc66WloQPuPtysw0+wvuIu2Jw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1703984862; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=cKZRNjZuSIE5ZP1C/MfD9/DEWw8OAFA1oOYR/oTjQqqHpHMkcBB/TAYLUsV5C2SgBa8cG2 QEh0VAUg+LgSkB2Nq+Pb1xGFpssHXK5BkitWU2Dz7UeiOKToGzK92OlnKD/8PR8l6W5+VI +wRzmwxjd365WT96padYEj7PK/VVVN18NXsVP90p+8hw2I2Q40tl6X3HH2/VVRtkbkOSlR nK4e675adNqOJMtvWc8c3kuuMFlZclKRsBgycs7O87QWzS8y2UaGRpdz/UWjmpHgpBcypq kFpuK4yrbrQD2pKj0SfOsk924sTEBL7JNlq1pGPol9hOXgGszaTOrp3uSUFuxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1703984862; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YregPaGd05qcwiiU/MjEzjxcE1yomp2RmTGw7WDgjpA=; b=cCUBGUQTVg5YbKRK64WI8t4FiU2lf0vEPg0beOecrxAOskLHoNKSGbg+fnCVlnAD3D+3ZC K8NRw4244QOt2qQFsLHZm/cKAf0cC426BOPAkMS+qhP+hI0aXGpalrAE9qGFCkUrWEXU1W txtWbPE8DhjUE4UOLI8QGumJgKT1uwcvv8JsXTNzBZxvosP9oK4h4RrCgsCfUP3WrrudH7 Lwcp9neCvtkZw4aXkmAe/zPtMuofiwWL63X8/Go6Hv7ngfHS9pQHbH+TnEwBGy+p1JbA2t 8c+fk5FyvKyfNZRgcx+138RAPYbMmEkHQxtasBuhzKLcGHVjEiBQ4/sNvkgXbQ== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 834BF8842; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 01:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 01:07:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Rene Ladan Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 3eadab0ea3ae - main - games/tomenet: unbreak the port, undeprecate, respect CFLAGS better. Message-ID: References: <202312301444.3BUEiIx5051540@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 02:44:18PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > commit 3eadab0ea3ae60cde9ffaa21c0caa71f48563827 > > > > games/tomenet: unbreak the port, undeprecate, respect CFLAGS better. > > --- > > -DEPRECATED= BROKEN for more than 2 years on all supported versions after the EOL of 12 > > -EXPIRATION_DATE= 2023-12-31 > > -BROKEN_FreeBSD_13= ld: error: duplicate symbol: lite_later > > -BROKEN_FreeBSD_14= ld: error: duplicate symbol: lite_later > > And there was no time in the past two years for you to fix this > port before? I was one of several who helped to fix initial bulk of broken ports after -fno-common was enforced, this one probably slipped through the cracks, but better late than never, no? :) The real question one should be asking, however, is why mark these ports BROKEN in the first place rather than fix them right away. ./danfe