From nobody Mon Nov 14 15:56:12 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N9vDj6fQJz4hRVX; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from sprint-2.amdmi3.ru (sprint-2.amdmi3.ru [185.185.68.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N9vDg3Mspz44Nm; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of amdmi3@amdmi3.ru has no SPF policy when checking 185.185.68.145) smtp.mailfrom=amdmi3@amdmi3.ru; dmarc=none Received: from amdmi3.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sprint-2.amdmi3.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E4D2187E15; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 19:02:36 +0300 (MSK) Received: by amdmi3.ru (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 amdmi3@amdmi3.ru; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 19:02:36 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:56:12 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f6826de8fbdf - main - www/firefox: update to 107.0 (rc2) Message-ID: References: <202211102100.2AAL0bnl052227@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.01 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.990]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; BLOCKLISTDE_FAIL(0.00)[185.185.68.145:server fail]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[amdmi3]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[amdmi3.ru]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35278, ipnet:185.185.68.0/22, country:RU] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N9vDg3Mspz44Nm X-Spamd-Bar: / X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N * Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net) wrote: > > > And for the minors often there's only one rc, which then becomes GA, > > > and I don't want package churn for no-ops. > > > > Do we really need rc's packaged then? > > The idea is that we get the bugfixes (most often security stuff) > earlier - also to give the package builders a head start (everyone > else gets packages built by upstream before release day, and we > have our own package cluster). > For the majore releases, we could spot and fix FreeBSD-specific > problems before GA - at least in theory, as I do not have that much > time for that, and most problems these days are self-inflicted by > the users, anyways. Okay then, the current way of firefox packaging looks reasonable. Thank you for explanation! -- Dmitry Marakasov . amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: https://github.com/AMDmi3 https://amdmi3.ru/