From nobody Fri Nov 11 19:36:34 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N88GH0JNBz4fmTB; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 19:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from sprint-2.amdmi3.ru (sprint-2.amdmi3.ru [IPv6:2a0a:2b41:94:cb5e::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N88GG6JBTz4F2J; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 19:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from amdmi3.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sprint-2.amdmi3.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id C7FAC187F46; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 22:42:47 +0300 (MSK) Received: by amdmi3.ru (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 amdmi3@amdmi3.ru; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 22:42:47 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 22:36:34 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f6826de8fbdf - main - www/firefox: update to 107.0 (rc2) Message-ID: References: <202211102100.2AAL0bnl052227@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N88GG6JBTz4F2J X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35278, ipnet:2a0a:2b41::/32, country:RU] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N * Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net) wrote: > > Would it be possible to use real version (e.g. 107.0rc2) for the port > > instead of faking release candidate as an official release? > > Somewhat difficult, as the final release is actually the last release > candidate, unchanged (really, distinfo doesn't change) so we'd be stuck > with 107.0rc2 (or something) until 108.0; and firefox itself believess > it's 107.0, too (that's even somewhat true for the betas, but you never > see them). > And for the minors often there's only one rc, which then becomes GA, > and I don't want package churn for no-ops. Do we really need rc's packaged then? -- Dmitry Marakasov . amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: https://github.com/AMDmi3 https://amdmi3.ru/