Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile
On 4/2/2011 10:57 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> I share your rationale for the most part, but I am still unclear about
> what some might call an 'edge' case.
It sounds to me like what you want are clear, bright lines that we can
form policy around. I wish you luck with that. :)
Meanwhile, given the way that our ports and packages work bumping
PORTREVISION is a blunt tool, and has tradeoffs. IMO ports committers
need to have some firm guidelines for the common cases, but also to use
their discretion on the edges.
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Received on Sun Apr 03 2011 - 20:39:13 UTC