Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:49:03PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Kris Kennaway p??e v p? 27. 01. 2006 v 16:13 -0500:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:41:01PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > | _at__at_ -17,6 +17,9 _at__at_
> > > | # Keep this list sorted in the chronological order. New entries must
> > > | # be added at the tail.
> > > | #
> > > | +# If previously removed port gets restored, make sure to delete the relevant
> > > | +# line.
> > It's more than that, though. If an old port is copied to a new
> > location and the old location is kept (e.g. upgraded to a later
> > version), don't record it here.
> Yes, I noticed few records like this, but I failed to come up with a
> concise sentence to note this. I blame my lack of English-fu.
> Would you mind suggesting a good wording for that?
My second sentence above? :)
> > e.g the entries relating to emacs -> emacs19, which you didn't remove.
> > If you have the emacs port installed, there's no way to tell whether
> > it is an old version that should migrate to emacs19, or a new version
> > that should stay in emacs.
> There is no entry for editors/emacs in the file.
You're right, someone already removed it.
Received on Fri Jan 27 2006 - 21:51:05 UTC
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored