From nobody Thu Jan 01 17:32:23 2026 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dhv6D5fDRz6MSYH; Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "fuz.su", Issuer "fuz.su" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dhv6D2m0Bz3RCH; Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuz.su (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 601HWNQL079560 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jan 2026 18:32:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz@fuz.su) Received: (from fuz@localhost) by fuz.su (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 601HWNEu079559; Thu, 1 Jan 2026 18:32:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fuz) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2026 18:32:23 +0100 From: Robert Clausecker To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: A question on how much of my list messaging is considered inappropriate content for the lists I post to? Message-ID: References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4dhv6D2m0Bz3RCH Hi Mark, Am Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:19:32PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard: > I'm not trying to gauge general interest in reading my > posts: it is perfectly normal for appropriate list > material to not be of interest to more than some subset > of folks. Instead I'm after learning if some of my posts > are viewed as inappropriate posting activity --and, if > some are, what about them is inappropriate (what should > not have been posted). I would appreciate if you ... - would post your threads to only one list at a time, as I usually get your mails two or three times from different lists usually. Decide which list is most appropriate and post there. If people care about ARM, they subscribe to the ARM list. If they don't, they don't. Respect their choice and keep ARM-related stuff on the ARM list so that people who don't care don't get your mails. - Remove all the noise and keep the emails succinct. If they are more than 100 lines I won't read them, as it takes too much time to get the useful bits out from all the extra stuff in them. In particalar, there is no need to post hundreds of lines of command output. - instead open a bugzilla issue with all the details - if you follow up, please only cite the relevant parts of your previous mails. Currently you cite the whole emails and just add some little blurp somewhere, making it extremely annoying to read followups. There is zero need to repeat all the old stuff, we all have your emails saved and can refer to them. Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an encoding-agnostic world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments