From nobody Wed Sep 24 09:30:39 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cWs653trhz68nSv for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obiwac@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com (mail-ot1-f42.google.com [209.85.210.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cWs646s7Lz41y4 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obiwac@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-74381e2079fso6455122a34.0 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 02:30:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758706251; x=1759311051; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n0gLrdXUFAC+cLwx6W1PEz/ygDvmZaLlzW5iRnCB5Z0=; b=oaq+wbhpymE//caSSmTggg43/jB6spE9IHvxvBmmPU9FfSzTgFtG0T+n9+Cv/uzvDB +H/dBHbDFYkPFNyZpZPvPAy8K5g6De07B0lB7+6Pl7oueVK2i/kuOTdWRBZ7jOo8zHyJ xEnLCIau8e7NXKUKz25lYKq2Oz0BiEtpxRfi0DpCArOAm9NC6yF252AmYjuutUUJUXHX XmG/5mlei1+RTqk1gLZJV6OIThzumSdAlooheGS8/2L4tDgQUMI1FwsKg8mht/TmFHHs 70sldtKL9ATI+JsaBOyZ46wTiM4bzdoRTEFsGVrxNorRh7m+Vm1nyP2BF6Wpr1CdiEUR 8+mg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXej0qwz9JBVDPVtmcAKogXmJhHP+cvzjn3ZGee6c3MPzN8voYX/NoV3GPk4uq6Chmp3apFTMdckRmpnw8clSA=@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdXKhYlWPsz50CresZCCmtQ3DyAU81a3w85LFyxq8uCKWxpEvw YG9VUu/EZ1B9QbhUyUP4UOEDxV06cXyCy26rX8Vo5v5Ijto0hKBlo6lZnrJCTnWVHcIHHQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvnibEC29+A+gg/L6vj6dQeYCuETLqWGBkPk2kTYtW0DuLoUPDTARLldZDtsF3 1HsjpXFVu7BI844b7SnxsFx261f5INm/3boNrEpwkoDKkVN1KYrIO44I5hXm5LRNBWgTuY6CBdU unizkbpGV/1GJVLsF4O9eA1+bOBFsqwgcVgQnuNGQWrs4Y3gqjEszd4nMOTI1sDgIsVukUrxR0z ddnEliLR4CPkAe6YhhSxC0pmxiWiwVFESmxemWq2DCtwwvOPqPywrGY5TTZfRMa3cZW7VWi71q4 MfNgKZCKHWW0rhO4D7jFFu64RSnWPkQyKuBNucCTqW0SngBTt2UyRLCK9hkd5/ATPBXX6F6r6t1 QKbhbUMl7HrM7HeYFordTcta2cCYI9YtqQFW3eC5mRpX1qbA1YHWTL51VjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJgsEwntfIvfCw+fh70dItZW2XQo2AWkNylJcI5S9B6ndDML9zLYraE1v2U6MTqy0YV5nHMA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3749:b0:745:52e9:f8c4 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7915edb4c0dmr3841960a34.34.1758706251499; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 02:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oo1-f47.google.com (mail-oo1-f47.google.com. [209.85.161.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-7691cbf90c7sm7652232a34.19.2025.09.24.02.30.51 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Sep 2025 02:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-62f5f5cfc58so1398148eaf.0 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 02:30:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWm124I6CPgEAMgOrl/lD9mENh9ouusP/oYj+xxm0d2D/AFtVedyyVVziGz/dXyLqONe38/RnPLSLd7MdGSBhI=@freebsd.org X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2e43:b0:437:dd6e:6844 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-43f2d46965dmr3276355b6e.38.1758706250958; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 02:30:50 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250922.112305.218918605244730977.yasu@FreeBSD.org> <2E2426C6-C2E4-49E1-99E5-60D5A98383BF@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: obiwac Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:30:39 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: AS18NWC2IKQ4HK8KUn7aVAGsCH5PLS0QJiXjIorEU2tN2fcGEF-6yzxg_s7CPgE Message-ID: Subject: Re: ACPI error after update to n280504-1f2a65222b88 To: Kevin Oberman Cc: "Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya)" , Yasuhiro Kimura , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4cWs646s7Lz41y4 > I wonder if this commit is related: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?= id=3D506b36c4fdde0b402cc730b41a9d9d20130e1bca (CCed obiwac@). This commit shouldn't be the issue as it is just a revert of a recent commi= t. > Thanks, but these errors were caused by hte commit that broke several por= ts including postfix. It turns out that rebuilding the failed ports. That i= s really a work-around, but allowed me to get postfix working correctly and= , as a fringe benefit, fixed the ACPI errors. since it was a change in erro= r returns that caused the problem. Which commit is that exactly? On Wed, 24 Sept 2025 at 07:53, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 7:25=E2=80=AFPM Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: >> >> >> > On Sep 21, 2025, at 10:41=E2=80=AFPM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 7:24=E2=80=AFPM Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: >> > From: Kevin Oberman >> > Subject: ACPI error after update to n280504-1f2a65222b88 >> > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 18:45:07 -0700 >> > >> > > Since updating my 16.0 system on Friday, I am getting lots of this e= rrors: >> > > acpi0: request to enter state NONE failed (err 22) >> >> `err 22` means `EINVAL`, which points to this block of code from= `sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c`: >> ``` >> 3193 acpi_ReqSleepState(struct acpi_softc *sc, int state) >> 3194 { >> 3195 #if defined(__amd64__) || defined(__i386__) >> 3196 struct apm_clone_data *clone; >> 3197 ACPI_STATUS status; >> 3198 >> 3199 if (state < ACPI_STATE_S1 || state > ACPI_S_STATES_MAX) >> 3200 return (EINVAL); >> ``` >> >> What state are you trying to enter? You might have not be enteri= ng the mode, which could be why you=E2=80=99re hitting that message (some d= efensive code might be missing). >> I wonder if this commit is related: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src= /commit/?id=3D506b36c4fdde0b402cc730b41a9d9d20130e1bca (CCed obiw= ac@). >> Cheers, >> -Enji > > > Thanks, but these errors were caused by hte commit that broke several por= ts including postfix. It turns out that rebuilding the failed ports. That i= s really a work-around, but allowed me to get postfix working correctly and= , as a fringe benefit, fixed the ACPI errors. since it was a change in erro= r returns that caused the problem. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683