From nobody Sun Nov 09 19:46:44 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4d4Nbb1ZLnz6Fvt2 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4d4Nbb108Cz3p9d; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1762717611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z+rS+WKMhT+COpISdFBpgsxRmb9oy758hm3WBsr1rEk=; b=ymR63hW9iRcq0HwCOD4zdrUrDv8S2ZWXzgmuobyKx2KKtzuxri3H8aCBjC2ZnIKimaMRel VwplDno3s2KHluZFCGMfcSY/YcagzmMnJETgwhGwUgVXLdpDn2n+qfQZ9F0p87rmFdbhr3 YY+igtQV1mIQUWUxKwKWcxretiiYhGfYxgOlWUDlgW6bI5pyfacbImgScHBupjdIT8oKce 3mv1LA4CmLbhX+HX9TZDTIPMhAn5Oth9sQGMfpI5pgWEg5MqbfNdipwgvQ3RPxMnS0ISKX fkzX9Fpx7tW6PLYHd2TMUV49e8A+gIFIWDIx8pp80Pk/XB/yIuwiDsF6g9mCzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1762717611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z+rS+WKMhT+COpISdFBpgsxRmb9oy758hm3WBsr1rEk=; b=CTNNtpq0HVEJlW7wdkT2FD5ecKMB3k78vMkx9mWlrKiQdLzjivBqNrvnxuLf1yRZxXI0US 3dV8xOzhd1F0YIXdXswi2xFuNppETLmB7A3ZFs394rsXGd3gWWYlG8jJXCPgstlL0r2xLe iEnN0WLpKH4Kd7OblWAJr9hptcYmz6n84sYI2KKy/0cQeUtYwnDZFxny3NDpiMPsPmUeO7 nm5nl6lcLzgP7ztkK1e7hv03/6+VDwO8EJZOhghGlGmfzx/oEZDFfArgmc7WYyna5hSChi zWDCaGGwoCYt+q0nKZW7DjYbAZ5hQvHs+mgTq3HE2hEjMwy3I8KNPrCeW39p5g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1762717611; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tzf3EzRMjkKfH4XKR4LMVLKMj5QppFc3NL8lAiF6eKAwAfpmhbjJ8JwYwtwjqvhj8mRaXj w9xiFIJAPqWu0L7q9midOATTxZwGM+Yb6AwnRHldJxiAgFmIH0Mop+WRboPuqdzgbRh2t1 KV8PPuJ5QUy7nkjZRMUAt2atx4Fp6g3u+qa3tAjUmhzAxaRZr+TEk2HY/T8fMK1Hcsnaql 2KXwuLqBFO5AmQZEUh/Nk0MJi70HZj1PxepSnnyPeJQcQsSW6ggo6TczbpcHEYvgT9B51l gnWFyEIQhckOtHDveFNYKdYOsTCdS9GrWeUrmKL0BhDgS3eEVR96kNOvdtH+hQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from mx-01.divo.sbone.de (mx-01.divo.sbone.de [IPv6:2003:a:140a:2200:6:594:fffe:19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx-01.divo.sbone.de", Issuer "E8" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: bz/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4d4NbZ6WTqzDKT; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-01.divo.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231E9A64805; Sun, 09 Nov 2025 19:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C292D029E6; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:46:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) by content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NOorRAOUnKYy; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nv.t4-02.sbone.de (nv.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABAFC2D029D8; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:46:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: Steve Kargl cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Backout git revision 4179e6b78297369f [that is also stable/15 and releng/15.0 as 62c3b77d1d10] In-Reply-To: <8cfec553-ac9b-4357-80c6-74b7442289e0@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <288036F0-180F-4DF4-94FD-66365B7504EA.ref@yahoo.com> <288036F0-180F-4DF4-94FD-66365B7504EA@yahoo.com> <255c624f-765c-4091-b3a5-22d439d292a1@comcast.net> <162qrp4-qr99-5qr6-413s-6r7rpr39nno9@SerrOFQ.bet> <8cfec553-ac9b-4357-80c6-74b7442289e0@comcast.net> X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sun, 9 Nov 2025, Steve Kargl wrote: > On 11/9/25 08:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> >> So if you want things to work, it's the ports which needs to be fixed. >> > > First, commit the patch from the PR. That fixes the problem. The -D is not for a drm-kmod/ports fix please; there's another semi-native driver in src which uses LinuxKPI headers and needed this and there's still a need to fix that. Then I'll see if I can get away with it within LinuxKPI itself. I added a suggested patch to your PR for the port for some grpahics/ports person to start work with and get it in. > Second, it is an interesting stance to to take. It's okay to > break/diminish the FreeBSD experience for others in the name > of progress. If that would be the case, then I probably wouldn't have bothered following up and helping identifying a better fix the moment I became aware of the problem. I am sorry x11 hasn't dealt with this since (must be) end of September. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7