From nobody Sun Nov 02 01:22:22 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4czcQg2Pqxz6Fc8f for ; Sun, 02 Nov 2025 01:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyric@mm.st) Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4czcQf2lwJz4Qfl for ; Sun, 02 Nov 2025 01:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyric@mm.st) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=mm.st header.s=fm3 header.b=dvVSKCyq; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="0/dqWr+h"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=mm.st; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cyric@mm.st designates 103.168.172.153 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cyric@mm.st Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97321140002E for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:22:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Nov 2025 21:22:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mm.st; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1762046549; x=1762132949; bh=/pCJeUCIkR9pK3f25S1KvllyivSXSyOHuYLWqIA39eo=; b= dvVSKCyqKijdD8BxRGawrRClk0Y0uwv3TdKLUrJVyfz/iQDvYcahw0rBZcYJMvHg cA7b6VkbMmJ8K+V5H7S8GVrtCCHYDHl5N8A/r2eP5RYs49oA4Xq9GSZJmWMN43x/ q8Q2oFjb4nD02OkyobdINnKAo2AeIPq65Jf7PQqwZFXevIDlK3j5dfy0FvT6598t Majqr7UTwoMBN4iiu8opW442M+IDrVHR1ADiu49cl4BK0gKBCGrVqixVo2LTGnH4 aXeB7mPYD41z4yA8VViL2g1yBGxGhYjWD02WhNino565Py4edI/7SfArtVi7SKqR eecivMUBW21aM4RKy3EVGA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1762046549; x=1762132949; bh=/ pCJeUCIkR9pK3f25S1KvllyivSXSyOHuYLWqIA39eo=; b=0/dqWr+hR+BP6NQyF T6T3Ytejy0RcSTxe8MC+qj3z7FCFx1R6oEC3AZ4eP6bDrAt9hqnOP1+CWjYMaWId hY+xIBw1426VlzrwaxIOwi7XMka0WM2Wb1rXsvCzLOTi43+S/8cvHT5lYfrJs/gg f1ljO0whMRMN26fjqYfC1CeZb4FYc9Pr2BzEJlzG3HvmJaLQ5p9y1t8J5HjvnXEf SVsDi8xFIQuJ6Ej7+3/zsET/L9niFd5slkKRbmhh/EljYtjCZTdiDZR2//GF/d5J Ry0O7hVgHMKVTqpZTgUl9sYUYRhi8nGPK7WSOlldIAKRlGDHI0IaWrPwboroeNBl 2McQg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddujeefledvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertd dtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpegthihrihgtsehmmhdrshhtnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteel ueduteefgfehgeetgffgvdejgfdvveekieekhfffhffgvdeuvddtleffiedtnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptgihrhhitgesmhhm rdhsthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoh epfhhrvggvsghsugdqtghurhhrvghnthesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: icc3648d4:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 21:22:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9ea41e44-7160-40eb-9d80-b8bf13a7f396@mm.st> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 08:22:22 +0700 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: a really big question : why not "^C" for a CTRL-C with default /bin/sh ? To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <864EE1FC-1533-47D4-A395-C24F25269EE0@freebsd.org> <342c6a91-a8a1-483d-861e-8e8c6d79998f@blastwave.org> Content-Language: en-US From: cyric@mm.st In-Reply-To: <342c6a91-a8a1-483d-861e-8e8c6d79998f@blastwave.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[mm.st,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[mm.st:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.153:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[mm.st]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[mm.st]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[mm.st:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4czcQf2lwJz4Qfl Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 11/1/25 20:30, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >> >>> On 2. Nov 2025, at 00:34, Dennis Clarke wrote: >>> >>>  >>> This is about as annoying as a small sharp stone stuck in a shoe : >>> > ... >> Wasn‘t this always the default behavior in /bin/sh? >> > > If it was and if it is then it is broken and always has been. > > No UNIX shell *ever* behaves this way in at least the last four decades. zsh does, ksh93 (illumos) does. > Perhaps three decades. As far back as I can recall and that includes > using paper terminals. It may be the libedit library there has a borked > way of dealing with a SIGINT.