From nobody Thu Dec 25 18:08:36 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dccF64fM4z6Ljph for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2025 18:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@walstatt-de.de) Received: from smtp052.goneo.de (smtp052.goneo.de [85.220.129.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dccF60KTpz3xdZ for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2025 18:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@walstatt-de.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from hub1.goneo.de (hub1.goneo.de [85.220.129.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp5.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B672407F9; Thu, 25 Dec 2025 19:08:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from hub1.goneo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub1.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6992402A6; Thu, 25 Dec 2025 19:08:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walstatt-de.de; s=DKIM001; t=1766686118; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kOVyjg5OfFfq+Ggyj1NxPHLNUV0IZ+OHHQ+vES/iVWc=; b=VEyjk8qVDkoKLXMePSip7nLUuQH/f9ZIVyZGAiiFz0pUyUfd9tNGls1ELytl9yUqRdUh9m 02JwA7YK+mu7jbJi1lYP4a2JMW6SppWToq4NJgDD9hx1pGs3iixVu+YTBModHFdmbJnUbw J6WFeNnQ13ghL+265jEdNk/KJnYixghNIVvYNKWkobzq+MVomxB4xGS9SnRv0+8GGmsdER uCAF/x66ZAb0ABz6k1Lv+TG/PCV85LDYc74DCUqju1MW+u2C6mU5Wp74p2WUZBWUEljLDQ Rb1/WrWpkYqheBz3Aotpy85+eCp0dXQrQluNbSvNlg6xkQoAxfDCt+fUHa8zdA== Received: from hermann (dynamic-2a02-3100-2d21-4f06-65cb-f1f4-3757-9958.310.pool.telefonica.de [IPv6:2a02:3100:2d21:4f06:65cb:f1f4:3757:9958]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hub1.goneo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9AAB240276; Thu, 25 Dec 2025 19:08:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 19:08:36 +0100 From: FreeBSD User To: Ronald Klop Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , David Wolfskill Subject: Re: CURRENT: kernel panic in IPFW while stopping jails Message-ID: <20251225190836.6769e6d6@hermann> In-Reply-To: <902742484.3865.1766683845222@localhost> References: <20251225170828.7aef61df@hermann> <902742484.3865.1766683845222@localhost> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-UID: dc2eb6 X-Rspamd-UID: f65b76 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25394, ipnet:85.220.128.0/17, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4dccF60KTpz3xdZ On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 18:30:45 +0100 (CET) Ronald Klop wrote: > Do you use bpf or tap in your ipfw rules? > A panic with that was mentioned on the 20th. And fixed in the mean time of I > remember correctly. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291854 > Regards,Ronald Indeed, all boxes in question do have a tap0 at least defined -but in only one case used. Kind regards, oh > > Van: FreeBSD User > Datum: 25 december 2025 17:09 > Aan: FreeBSD CURRENT > Onderwerp: CURRENT: kernel panic in IPFW while stopping jails > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > on recent CURRENT ipfw (in my case compiled into kernel) either restarting > > "ipfw" via "service ipfw restart" or restarting jails using also ipfw on a > > host also using ipfw (jail-hoster also ipfw compiled into kernel) causes a > > fatal kernel crash. > > > > This issue is present since last week an wreak havok to several boxes with > > OS installed on UFS/FFS SSDs. In one case I have only pictures/screenshots > > made via smartphone - while crashing, kernel debugger input pops up on > > console, but I'm able to typein something within the first seconds and this > > is mostly "reboot" but gets stuck with "re" in most cases. "bt" freezes > > system immediately. > > > > At least I can reproduce this misbehaviour on all recent CURRENT were IPFW > > is compiled into kernel. Anybody else havong this trouble? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Oliver > > > > Merry Christmas to everyone. > > > > -- > > > > A FreeBSD user > > > > > > > > > >