From nobody Mon Apr 07 16:05:48 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZWYwF751Vz5rW4p; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZWYwF4zjrz3w5s; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1744041949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qewJ3X47av7wlASuwGYGmUIo5Mmik2EhSzt7rTI2vJw=; b=m+M6ANwLOJ8nzWtkbTEtlXQs/oo/x9lqjNXGtqKthkFKSNIL4OOGA4ayvo+cyXyT//b5Ih XCRCQt0hHhlx6hlu2tjnu5f/l+jTNIVOa/0ruwO/bj/rqxBJgmXR0n+OsX/qxkZe9eESI3 VouXcUi3cTmaWqZhVg0HP90J0LgAdsQjaGQcBJkRVs/ZnKTkxk96QE24rpIQstqbVVLUOd rMdYtxku2PYCc6v0K86jNEOZ8AA+pJDjhKxuF/Q5Pr6zu1RYzC+6hiFMI7ulyBc69VBJhM fztBfr81bgNje3zrUcjAEBcLY0lO1q0rfkCed7huJa421U5tZwEqv3dF4vHaiQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1744041949; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UB3+oqTNOqlFsA9ETtgIfm54tvQfv5N5O4szOfM16G5pSr878i2ykEeZFOEEXVCqYmvQ6d P7c405/Eb1fzd+XCIJ9AJRT/dcdutF9cYgRLh5m6IK0eJMV/e3oca/5lQO6Jv7WbKIokoZ wHhKsTfIhaMYzvHsM16+PUl3tGzdrmUwJOdCFNXBF7GyBE/dZoOoU/0ZnT6m02DZ3xlZV5 aCKZ2vkpKJ53Dgr2+rz3Qxw/9cmVxO2xvL+bdafEsYM2YpPoK261Nyh64fo2eYFYQO/mX6 mXN2YweZ5mI1htWZHXFRoypZGh6nKFrBeUF/aOBzuCzaxnvjn+bq7q5VyTGNqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1744041949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qewJ3X47av7wlASuwGYGmUIo5Mmik2EhSzt7rTI2vJw=; b=GJzCPq4TT95tLMkfqeySbDWcvoSjZY4pKKQ8KBpFFVVTumNhrTTfIBc+VHvAr2SEzUrxTD olfLe0Dor7jYam45Dh7ROgp2dcqhtW2+czOblw1basR/hWSs6cCufBqPt2xP7IQg87WtLu iZnJDZLp4CXAaOFHMPpaNKWvBVWXPn7QkaQcSW4CECgha0YlK5H+uiSItcC44hMPsV/cPW CLdDgAa0u0gt0c7ykF9xQrMaFK+F0xF1skK3VCMPMJ31o2qdVAOab+1FrWzkfZyGz9GkGk FBBhtHoFjMZOPkXG+hkOf80Vkt0bf+YvNIJjXfuD5gYu0+hGd4VOFjMWTYBIew== Received: from b.nours.eu (b.nours.eu [54.38.177.57]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZWYwF35lFzBFf; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by b.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3E2D68614; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 18:05:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:05:48 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Mark Millard , Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [a specific package with large time factor] Message-ID: References: <84FBBAF8-025E-4B9D-9797-51735567A8DB@yahoo.com> <366E27FD-FA5B-4BF8-B6C4-6C495DB289C5@yahoo.com> <7ziazrj7szuqhov3oppjbh3jyu3f2p2owntv4oxprelrdjzc6u@hkuf5szf3zwy> <202504071559.537Fx1JY002835@critter.freebsd.dk> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202504071559.537Fx1JY002835@critter.freebsd.dk> On Mon 07 Apr 15:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > Listing like this is clearly not any useful, the problem we have is the > > performance changes depending on what is happening in parallel on the machines. > > Sounds like increased memory footprint to me ? The memory footprint should not be that significant, but for sure we allocated/deallocate way more things. so clearly this is where I am looking at first, I have an idea in mind to improve reduce a bit more this, but I need time to implement. Best regards, Bapt