ZFS Deadlock?

Nick Sivo nick at ycombinator.com
Sat Mar 7 22:54:02 UTC 2015


Unfortunately in our case we can't easily upgrade to 10 or 10.1
because Racket (6.1.1) on them isn't stable and core dumps. Fixing
Racket trunk on FreeBSD 10+ was not the next step I expected,
especially since 9.3 is still considered "supported" for nearly two
more years.

Not what I wanted to hear, but good to know regardless. Thanks!

-Nick

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated
>>>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there.
>>>>>
>>>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4?  Will there be a 9.4?
>>>>
>>> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to
>>> 10 not 9 or 8.
>>
>> I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more
>> releases just patches...  but are we not getting a 9.4?  Should not the
>> known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated?
>>
> I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I wouldn't
> expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm honest, the team
> only has so much time so prioritising the latest releases is just something
> that's going to have to happen.
>
> We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list