ZFS raid write performance?

Xin Li delphij at delphij.net
Mon Jun 22 23:04:58 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 06/22/15 05:13, kpneal at pobox.com wrote:
> For both reads and writes all levels of raidz* perform slightly
> faster than the speed of a single drive. _Slightly_ faster, like,
> the speed of a single drive * 1.1 or so roughly speaking.

How big is the data block for each read-write?  For large blocks
RAID-Z is likely to perform nearly as well as stripped disks (e.g. 3
disks RAID-Z is slightly slower than 2 disk stripped, but would be
much better than single disk pool).  Typically copying data would use
larger data blocks.

For smaller writes it's likely to have worse results.

> Finally, single GigE is _slow_. I see no point in a "landing pad"
> when using unbonded GigE.

How will a "landing pad" help when let's say we have 10GigE or even
faster network connection?

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net>    https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!           Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1.5 (FreeBSD)
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=CIqL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list