fdisk(8) vs gpart(8), and gnop
Steven Hartland
killing at multiplay.co.uk
Mon Jun 2 20:45:51 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren Block" <wblock at wonkity.com>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Whitehorn"
>> <nwhitehorn at freebsd.org>
>>>
>>> I think we basically don't have any lying disks anymore. The ATA code does
>>> a very good job of this -- most tell the truth, but in an odd way that gets
>>> reported up the stack. ada(4) has a quirks table for the ones that do not.
>>> If this is the only concern, then we should just stop telling people to
>>> worry about this.
>>>
>>> My bigger concern is this pool upgrade one -- what if someone puts in a 4K
>>> disk in the future?
>>
>> Thats very much not the case I'm afraid, I try to add quirks for disk as
>> they are reported but there's always going to be quite a few which are
>> wrong until manufacturers stop making their FW lie :(
>>
>
> Both gpart and diskinfo show the correct values in the stripesize
> fields. At least, I've yet to see it be wrong. Maybe that is where ZFS
> should be getting the blocksize anyway.
>
> (Of course, stripesize might only be correct due to the quirks you
> mention, in which case... never mind.)
It is indeed because of the quirks we've manually entered I'm afraid :(
Regards
Steve
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list