Strange IO performance with UFS

Konstantin Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Sun Jul 6 08:46:25 UTC 2014


On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:13:29AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 6 July 2014 00:17, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 05:34:48PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Hm, wait a sec. So if the IO size is a multiple of the underlying FS
> >> block size, it should be okay?
> > It was already suggested in the thread, and confirmed later.
> > Did you read the mails ?
> 
> I did, I must've missed it. SOrry!

The thread was definitely long.

I am slightly curious how other systems perform in this case.
In particular, since fio is originating from Linux, it probably
should demonstrate some good behaviour with the default settings.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20140706/d19e16ca/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list