Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays?

[Alexander Best]

On Sun Nov  6 11, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 07:16, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Fri Nov  4 11, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> >> Matt Connor wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 3, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Ivan Voras<ivoras at freebsd.org>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 02/11/2011 12:57, Borja Marcos wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>> Did you forget to do "make clean" after "make install" on several large
> >>>> ports?
> >>>>
> >>>> But yes, the ports tree is getting a bit unwieldy. On the other hand,
> >>>> did you fsck the file system lately?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade&&  make install clean
> >>>
> >>> portsclean -CD
> >>>
> >>> That's a quick way to clean out all the clutter.
> >>
> >> Installing ruby and portupgrade is really big overhead to simple task, 
> >> which can be done by:
> >>
> >> cd /usr/ports && make clean
> >>
> >> or with find:
> >>
> >> find /usr/ports/ -depth 3 -name "work" -exec rm -r {} +
> > 
> > ...or with 'rm -rf /usr/ports/*/*/work'
> 
> This comes up periodically, and for some reason no one pays attention to
> all the work that's been done in the past to verify that the fastest
> method is:
> 
> find /usr/ports -maxdepth 3 -type d -name -work -exec rm -rf {} \;

1) -work ?
2) i like -depth 3 better, because it will not touch my /usr/ports/work
   directory, where i keep my latest ports stuff (theoretically).
3) are you sure \; is "faster" than + ?

cheers.
alex

> 
> Of course, the best solution by far is to set WRKDIRPREFIX to a path
> with adequate space, preferably something other than /usr/obj.
> 
> 
> hth,
> 
> Doug
> 
> -- 
> 
> 		"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
> 		"Too practical."
> 
> 	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
> 	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/