Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 10:00:31 UTC
On 5/22/23 01:07, Mark Millard wrote: > In the C language standard, the original had a status of "no linkage" > and "static storage duration". ("a block scope identifier > for an object declared without the storage-class specifier > extern" leads to the "no linkage" status.) > > The change still has "static storage duration" but now has "internal > linkage" status instead. I'm being cautious about the distinction. > > (I'm looking at ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (E).) > > I've had trouble identifying the match of your wordings to the > language standard, leaving me unsure of the interpretation to > give your wording. > > I've yet to figure out why internal linkage could end up > being required, given how the language specifies things. Hi, If you find something, let me know. I'll let the issue rest for some days. --HPS