svn commit: r194449 - vendor-sys/opensolaris/dist/uts/common/dtrace vendor/opensolaris/dist/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/funcs vendor/opensolaris/dist/cmd/sgs/include vendor/opensolaris/dist/lib/libd...

[John Baldwin]

On Thursday 18 June 2009 5:27:27 pm N.J. Mann wrote:
> In message <20090618205149.GA19022 at server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>,
> 	Peter Jeremy (peterjeremy at optushome.com.au) wrote:
> > On 2009-Jun-18 17:11:24 +0000, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >Author: jhb
> > >Date: Thu Jun 18 17:11:24 2009
> > >New Revision: 194449
> > >URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194449
> > 
> > Can anyone explain why I have two distinctly different SVN commit
> > mails both with the same subject for r194449?  r149445 is similar.  I
> > also have two copies of r149446 but they appear to be identical.
> 
> I was about to ask the same question.  Looking at the headers it would
> appear they _are_ separate messages.  r194449 for example:
> 
> Message-Id: <200906181711.n5IHBOKt017645 at svn.freebsd.org>
> From: John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
> To: src-committers at freebsd.org, svn-src-all at freebsd.org,
>         svn-src-vendor at freebsd.org
> X-SVN-Group: vendor-sys
> 
> Message-Id: <200906181711.n5IHBOPr017629 at svn.freebsd.org>
> From: John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
> To: src-committers at freebsd.org, svn-src-all at freebsd.org,
>         svn-src-vendor at freebsd.org
> X-SVN-Group: vendor
> 
> So, the next question is what is the relevance if X-SVN-Group ?

The other thing that stuck out to me was that vendor-sys e-mails claimed the 
commits to 'vendor' were changes in "other areas also in this revision", but 
that the vendor e-mails claimed that the entire commit was all in the same 
area.

-- 
John Baldwin