svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts

Fri Jan 17 00:03:44 UTC 2020

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 02:43:37PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:

> 16.01.2020 4:41, Ed Maste wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 16:10, Eugene Grosbein <eugen at grosbein.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> There are multiple scenarios there ZFS may be sub-optimal at least: small i386 virtual guests
> >> or 32-bit only hardware like AMD Geode, or big amd64 SSD-only systems with bhyve and multiple guests
> >> that need lots of memory and should not fight with ZFS for RAM etc.
> > 
> > That may well be the case, but our defaults should represent the
> > configuration that's desirable to the largest set of users, and IMO
> > that's ZFS in most cases today.
> > 
> > It might be that we should default to UFS on i386 and ZFS on amd64?
> 
> UFS may be better for any virtual guest having RAM less or equal to 4GB.

Why?