svn commit: r273417 - head

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > I would prefer calling this MK_ATF than MK_TESTS_SUPPORT, though.
> > The test framework is probably useful on its own.
> That would be a nicer name, but then we’d lose the automatic setting
> when MK_TESTS is enabled (unless we add another special case, which is
> the opposite direction that I want to go in). How strongly do you feel
> that’s a better name?

Is _SUPPORT magic?  I didn't know.  I guess MK_TESTS_SUPPORT is good
enough, especially if it's on by default.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no